Hello tobex,
While the original question may have been answered by posts above, I'm
interested:
when you say according to zfs list the zvol is 100% full, does it only mean
that it
uses all 20Gb on the pool (like a non-sparse uncompressed file), or does it
also imply
that you can't write into
Hi Jim,
first of all I'm sure this behaviour is a bug or has been changed
sometime in the past, because I've used this configuration a lot of times.
If I understand you right it is as you said.
Here's an example and you can see what happened. The sam-fs is filled to
only 6% and the zvol ist
If I understand you right it is as you said.
Here's an example and you can see what happened.
The sam-fs is filled to only 6% and the zvol ist full.
I'm afraid I was not clear with my question, so I'd elaborate, then.
It remains standing as: during this situation, can you write new data into
Concerning the reservations, here's a snip from man zfs:
The reservation is kept equal to the volume's logical
size to prevent unexpected behavior for consumers.
Without the reservation, the volume could run out of
space, resulting in undefined
No,
just did zfs create -V.
and I didn't change the size of the zpool or zvol at any time..
regards,
Tobias
Jim Klimov schrieb:
Concerning the reservations, here's a snip from man zfs:
The reservation is kept equal to the volume's logical
size to prevent
Hi list,
I've did some tests and run into a very strange situation..
I created a zvol using zfs create -V and initialize an sam-filesystem
on this zvol.
After that I restored some testdata using a dump from another system.
So far so good.
After some big troubles I found out that releasing
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 02:14:24PM +0200, Tobias Exner wrote:
Hi list,
I've did some tests and run into a very strange situation..
I created a zvol using zfs create -V and initialize an sam-filesystem
on this zvol.
After that I restored some testdata using a dump from another system.
Hi Dean,
may you provide more infos about that?
Are you able to send me a bug description for a better understanding?
Is there a patch available, or do I have to use a previous patch of sam-qfs?
Thanks in advance...
Tobias
Dean Roehrich schrieb:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 02:14:24PM +0200,
