C. Bergström wrote:
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
I don't know if anyone has noticed that the topic is google summer of
code. There is only so much that a starving college student can
accomplish from a dead-start in 1-1/2 months. The ZFS equivalent of
eliminating world hunger is not among the
Dave wrote:
C. Bergström wrote:
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
I don't know if anyone has noticed that the topic is google summer
of code. There is only so much that a starving college student can
accomplish from a dead-start in 1-1/2 months. The ZFS equivalent of
eliminating world hunger is not
Its been suggested before and I've heard its in the freebsd port...
support for spindown?
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Dave dave-...@dubkat.com wrote:
C. Bergström wrote:
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
I don't know if anyone has noticed that the topic is google summer of
code. There is only so
I would really like to see a feature like 'zfs diff f...@snap1 f...@othersnap'
that would report the paths of files that have either been added, deleted,
or changed between snapshots. If this could be done at the ZFS level instead
of the application level it would be very cool.
--
AFAIK,
Wes Felter wrote:
slog and L2ARC on the same SSD
You can do that already today.
Create two slices using format(1M) and add the slices rather than the
whole disk as the L2ARC or slog device.
However IMO this is with current SSD techology probably the wrong thing
to do. The slog wants a
gm == Gary Mills mi...@cc.umanitoba.ca writes:
gm There are many different components that could contribute to
gm such errors.
yes of course.
gm Since only the lower ZFS has data redundancy, only it can
gm correct the error.
um, no?
An example already pointed out: kerberized
On 5-Mar-09, at 2:03 PM, Miles Nordin wrote:
gm == Gary Mills mi...@cc.umanitoba.ca writes:
gm There are many different components that could contribute to
gm such errors.
yes of course.
gm Since only the lower ZFS has data redundancy, only it can
gm correct the error.
um,
tt == Toby Thain t...@telegraphics.com.au writes:
c For writing, application-level checksums do NOT work at all,
c because you would write corrupt data to the disk, and notice
c only later when you read it back
tt Right, it would have to be combined with an always read-back
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 11:35:40PM +0200, C. Bergström wrote:
Here's more or less what I've collected...
[..]
10) Did I miss something..
I suppose my RFE for two-level ZFS should be included, unless nobody
intends to attach a ZFS file server to a SAN with ZFS on application
servers.
--
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Gary Mills mi...@cc.umanitoba.ca wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 11:35:40PM +0200, C. Bergström wrote:
Here's more or less what I've collected...
[..]
10) Did I miss something..
I suppose my RFE for two-level ZFS should be included, unless nobody
nw == Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@sun.com writes:
nw IIRC Jeff Bonwick has said on this list that ubberblock
nw rollback on import is now his higher priority. So working on
nw (8) would be duplication of effort.
well...if your recovery tool worked by using an older
gm == Gary Mills mi...@cc.umanitoba.ca writes:
gm I suppose my RFE for two-level ZFS should be included,
Not that my opinion counts for much, but I wasn't deaf to it---I did
respond.
I thought it was kind of based on mistaken understanding. It included
this strangeness of the upper ZFS
I don't know if anyone has noticed that the topic is google summer of
code. There is only so much that a starving college student can
accomplish from a dead-start in 1-1/2 months. The ZFS equivalent of
eliminating world hunger is not among the tasks which may be
reasonably accomplished, yet
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
I don't know if anyone has noticed that the topic is google summer of
code. There is only so much that a starving college student can
accomplish from a dead-start in 1-1/2 months. The ZFS equivalent of
eliminating world hunger is not among the tasks which may be
On 4-Mar-09, at 1:28 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
I don't know if anyone has noticed that the topic is google summer
of code. There is only so much that a starving college student
can accomplish from a dead-start in 1-1/2 months. The ZFS
equivalent of eliminating world hunger is not among
C. Bergström wrote:
10) Did I miss something..
T10 DIF support in zvols
T10 UNMAP/thin provisioning support in zvols
proportional scheduling for storage performance
slog and L2ARC on the same SSD
These are probably difficult but hopefully not world hunger level.
Wes Felter -
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 02:16:53PM -0600, Wes Felter wrote:
T10 UNMAP/thin provisioning support in zvols
That's probably simple enough, and sufficiently valuable too.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
2009/3/4 Tim t...@tcsac.net:
I know plenty of home users would like the ability to add a single disk to
a raid-z vdev in order to grow a disk at a time.
+1 for that.
--
Kind regards, Jules
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Wed, March 4, 2009 16:53, Julius Roberts wrote:
2009/3/4 Tim t...@tcsac.net:
I know plenty of home users would like the ability to add a single
disk to
a raid-z vdev in order to grow a disk at a time.
+1 for that.
In theory I'd like that a lot.
I'm now committed to two two-disk mirrors
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 01:20:42PM -0500, Miles Nordin wrote:
gm == Gary Mills mi...@cc.umanitoba.ca writes:
gm I suppose my RFE for two-level ZFS should be included,
Not that my opinion counts for much, but I wasn't deaf to it---I did
respond.
I appreciate that.
I thought it was
On 4-Mar-09, at 7:35 PM, Gary Mills wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 01:20:42PM -0500, Miles Nordin wrote:
gm == Gary Mills mi...@cc.umanitoba.ca writes:
gm I suppose my RFE for two-level ZFS should be included,
Not that my opinion counts for much, but I wasn't deaf to it---I did
Gary Mills wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 01:20:42PM -0500, Miles Nordin wrote:
gm == Gary Mills mi...@cc.umanitoba.ca writes:
gm I suppose my RFE for two-level ZFS should be included,
Not that my opinion counts for much, but I wasn't deaf to it---I did
respond.
I appreciate that.
I
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 06:31:59PM -0700, Dave wrote:
Gary Mills wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 01:20:42PM -0500, Miles Nordin wrote:
gm == Gary Mills mi...@cc.umanitoba.ca writes:
gm I suppose my RFE for two-level ZFS should be included,
It's a simply a consequence of ZFS's end-to-end
Gary Mills wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 06:31:59PM -0700, Dave wrote:
Gary Mills wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 01:20:42PM -0500, Miles Nordin wrote:
gm == Gary Mills mi...@cc.umanitoba.ca writes:
gm I suppose my RFE for two-level ZFS should be included,
It's a simply a consequence
For reasons which I don't care about Sun may not apply to be a gsoc
organization this year. However, I'm not discouraged from trying to
propose some exciting zfs related ideas. On/off list feel free to send
your vote, let me know if you can mentor or if you know a company that
could use
C. Bergström wrote:
For reasons which I don't care about Sun may not apply to be a gsoc
organization this year. However, I'm not discouraged from trying to
propose some exciting zfs related ideas. On/off list feel free to
send your vote, let me know if you can mentor or if you know a
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 11:35:40PM +0200, C. Bergström wrote:
7) vdev evacuation as an upgrade path (which may depend or take
advantage of zfs resize/shrink code)
IIRC Matt Ahrens has said on this list that vdev evacuation/pool
shrinking is being worked. So (7) would be duplication of
When I go here:
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/isns/bui
I get an error. Where are you getting BUI from?
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.comwrote:
FWIW, I just took at look at the BUI in b108 and it seems to have
garnered some love since the last time
10) Did I miss something..
Somehow, what I posted on the web forum didn't make it to the mailing
list digest...
How about implementing dedup? This has been listed as an RFE for
almost a year, http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6677093
and discussed here,
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 3:35 PM, C. Bergström cbergst...@netsyncro.comwrote:
For reasons which I don't care about Sun may not apply to be a gsoc
organization this year. However, I'm not discouraged from trying to propose
some exciting zfs related ideas. On/off list feel free to send your
Blake wrote:
When I go here:
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/isns/bui
I get an error. Â Where are you getting BUI from?
The BUI is in webconsole which is available on your local machine at
port 6789
https://localhost:6798
If you want to access it remotely, you'll need to change the
That's what I thought you meant, and I got excited thinking that you were
talking about OpenSolaris :)
I'll see about getting the new packages and trying them out.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.comwrote:
Blake wrote:
When I go here:
32 matches
Mail list logo
