Suffice to say, 2 top-level raidz2 vdevs of similar size with copies=2
should offer very nearly the same protection as raidz2+1.
-- richard
This looks like the way to go. Thanks for your input. It's much appreciated!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:04:49 -0700, Richard Elling
richard.ell...@gmail.com wrote:
You can get in the same ballpark with at least two top-level
raidz2 devs and copies=2. If you have three or more
top-level raidz2 vdevs, then you can even do better
with copies=3 ;-)
Please note that copies=3
On Aug 22, 2009, at 1:02 PM, Kees Nuyt wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:04:49 -0700, Richard Elling
richard.ell...@gmail.com wrote:
You can get in the same ballpark with at least two top-level
raidz2 devs and copies=2. If you have three or more
top-level raidz2 vdevs, then you can even do better
On Aug 21, 2009, at 5:46 PM, Ron Mexico no-re...@opensolaris.org
wrote:
I'm in the process of setting up a NAS for my company. It's going to
be based on Open Solaris and ZFS, running on a Dell R710 with two
SAS 5/E HBAs. Each HBA will be connected to a 24 bay Supermicro JBOD
chassis.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 21, 2009, at 5:46 PM, Ron Mexico no-re...@opensolaris.org wrote:
I'm in the process of setting up a NAS for my company. It's going to be
based on Open Solaris and ZFS, running on a Dell R710 with two SAS 5/E HBAs.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 21, 2009, at 6:34 PM, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com
rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 21, 2009, at 5:46 PM, Ron Mexico no-re...@opensolaris.org
You'll have to add a bit of meat to this!
What are you resiliency, space and performance
requirements?
Resiliency is most important, followed by space and then speed. It's primary
function is to host digital assets for ad agencies and backups of other servers
and workstations in the
Ron Mexico wrote:
You'll have to add a bit of meat to this!
What are you resiliency, space and performance
requirements?
Resiliency is most important, followed by space and then speed. It's primary
function is to host digital assets for ad agencies and backups of other servers
and
On Aug 21, 2009, at 3:34 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Aug 21, 2009, at 5:46 PM, Ron Mexico no-re...@opensolaris.org
wrote:
I'm in the process of setting up a NAS for my company. It's going to
be based on Open Solaris and
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.comwrote:
On Aug 21, 2009, at 3:34 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 21, 2009, at 5:46 PM, Ron Mexico no-re...@opensolaris.org wrote:
I'm in the process of
On Aug 21, 2009, at 5:55 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.com
wrote:
My vote is with Ross. KISS wins :-)
Disclaimer: I'm also a member of BAARF.
My point is, RAIDZx+1 SHOULD be simple. I don't entirely understand
why it hasn't been
On 21-Aug-09, at 21:04 , Richard Elling wrote:
My point is, RAIDZx+1 SHOULD be simple. I don't entirely
understand why it hasn't been implemented. I can only imagine like
so many other things it's because there hasn't been significant
customer demand. Unfortunate if it's as simple as I
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.comwrote:
On Aug 21, 2009, at 5:55 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.com
wrote:
My vote is with Ross. KISS wins :-)
Disclaimer: I'm also a member of BAARF.
My
On Aug 21, 2009, at 6:09 PM, Adam Sherman wrote:
On 21-Aug-09, at 21:04 , Richard Elling wrote:
My point is, RAIDZx+1 SHOULD be simple. I don't entirely
understand why it hasn't been implemented. I can only imagine
like so many other things it's because there hasn't been
significant
comment far below...
On Aug 21, 2009, at 6:17 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Aug 21, 2009, at 5:55 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.com
wrote:
My vote is with
15 matches
Mail list logo
