2009 20:40
To: Markus Kovero; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: RE: [zfs-discuss] sync replication easy way?
At 8:25 PM +0300 9/11/09, Markus Kovero wrote:
I believe failover is best to be done manually just to be sure
active node is really dead before importing it on another node,
otherwise
On Sep 11, 2009, at 13:40, Maurice Volaski wrote:
At 8:25 PM +0300 9/11/09, Markus Kovero wrote:
I believe failover is best to be done manually just to be sure
active node is really dead before importing it on another node,
otherwise there could be serious issues I think.
I believe there
This method also allows one to nest mirroring or some RAID-z level with
mirroring.
When I tested it with a older build a while back, I found performance really
poor, about 1-2 MB/second, but my environment was also constrained.
A major showstopper had been the infamous 3 minute iSCSI timeout,
On Sep 11, 2009, at 5:05 AM, Markus Kovero wrote:
Hi, I was just wondering following idea, I guess somebody mentioned
something similar and I’d like some thoughts on this.
1. create iscsi volume on Node-A and mount it locally with
iscsiadm
2. create pool with this local
Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com]
Sent: 11. syyskuuta 2009 19:53
To: Markus Kovero
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] sync replication easy way?
On Sep 11, 2009, at 5:05 AM, Markus Kovero wrote:
Hi, I was just wondering following idea, I guess somebody mentioned
...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Maurice Volaski
Sent: 11. syyskuuta 2009 19:24
To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] sync replication easy way?
This method also allows one to nest mirroring or some RAID-z level with
mirroring.
When I tested it with a older build a while back
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Richard Elling
richard.ell...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 11, 2009, at 5:05 AM, Markus Kovero wrote:
Hi, I was just wondering following idea, I guess somebody mentioned
something similar and I’d like some thoughts on this.
1. create iscsi volume on Node-A
At 8:25 PM +0300 9/11/09, Markus Kovero wrote:
I believe failover is best to be done manually just to be sure
active node is really dead before importing it on another node,
otherwise there could be serious issues I think.
I believe there are many users of Linux-HA, aka heartbeat, who do
