Hi Hernan,
after looking at your posts my suggestion would be to
try the OpenSolaris 2008.05 Live CD and to import your
pool using the CD. That CD is nv86 + some extra fixes.
You will have to use 'pfexec' when you are trying to import
the pool. ( www.opensolaris.com )
I read this and I am not
A further update. With B90 and UFS as root partition, the ZFS administration
GUI worked fine. So I presented two additional disks and proceeded to create a
zpool. The creation of the pool worked fine however the ZFS administration
interface is now broken with the same error as in the original
I checked - this system has a UFS root. When
installed as snv_84 and then LU'd to snv_89, and when
I fiddled with these packages from various other
releases, it had the stacktrace instead of the ZFS
admin GUI (or the well-known smcwebserver restart
effect for the older packages).
.
Paulo Soeiro wrote:
Greetings,
I was experimenting with zfs, and i made the following test, i shutdown
the computer during a write operation
in a mirrored usb storage filesystem.
Here is my configuration
NGS USB 2.0 Minihub 4
3 USB Silicom Power Storage Pens 1 GB each
These are the
Keith Bierman wrote:
On May 30, 2008, at 6:59 PM, Erik Trimble wrote:
The only drawback of the older Socket 940 Opterons is that they don't
support the hardware VT extensions, so running a Windows guest
under xVM
on them isn't currently possible.
From the VirtualBox manual,
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 8:25 AM, Darryl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is my first post here, and i hope it is ok that i posted in this
thread.
I have been doing a bit of reading on the solaris platforms, and seem to be
inclined to try out the open solaris os or solaris 10. My only worry is
This is my first post here, and i hope it is ok that i posted in this thread.
I have been doing a bit of reading on the solaris platforms, and seem to be
inclined to try out the open solaris os or solaris 10. My only worry is that my
lack of knowledge with the command line may make this
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Darryl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to do iscsi over wifi, aside from speed limitations of the
wireless, i wanted to format the drive in hfs format.
It should be, it's just IP. But why not use CIFS to share it instead?
It'd be more portable across
Thanks for your answer,
after looking at your posts my suggestion would be to
try the OpenSolaris 2008.05 Live CD and to import
your pool using the CD. That CD is nv86 + some extra
fixes.
I upgraded the snv85 to snv89 to see if it helped, but it didn't. I'll try to
download the 2008.05 CD
Thommy,
If I read correctly your post stated that the pools did not automount on
startup, not that they would go corrupt. It seems to me that Paulo is
actually experiencing a corrupt fs
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thommy M.
Sent: 02
On Mon, 2 Jun 2008, Darryl wrote:
My end goal is to use this box, to store my media files. Connect it
to my airport extreme router via gigabit ether, and depending on
situation access data via wifi (smb share) or ether via router
(iscsi), both on a Mac. Is it possible to do iscsi over
On Jun 2, 2008, at 3:24 AM 6/2/, Erik Trimble wrote:
Keith Bierman wrote:
On May 30, 2008, at 6:59 PM, Erik Trimble wrote:
The only drawback of the older Socket 940 Opterons is that they
don't
support the hardware VT extensions, so running a Windows guest
under xVM
on them isn't
Use froogle for price checking.
I don't know what chipsets are supported by opensolaris, but if I were you I'd
be looking hard at motherboards with as much integrated as possible. For
instance, for less than $100 you can get a mini-atx motherboard with 6 SATA
ports and onboard video. I found
As a side bar, since you cannot remove a vdev, you can really shot
oneself in the foot if not careful (as I recently did). I had a X4500
system with (4) RAIDz2 vdevs in one pool. When adding a disk to the
system, I forgot to add it as a spare and I was left with a stripe
across the
| My impression is that the only real problem with incrementals from
| ufsdump or star is that you would like to have a database that tells
| you in which incremental a specific file with a specific time stamp
| may be found.
In our situation here, this is done by the overall backup system
Chris Siebenmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| My impression is that the only real problem with incrementals from
| ufsdump or star is that you would like to have a database that tells
| you in which incremental a specific file with a specific time stamp
| may be found.
In our situation here,
On my heavily-patched Solaris 10U4 system, the size of /var (on UFS)
has gotten way out of hand due to the remarkably large growth of
/var/sadm. Can this directory tree be safely moved to a zfs
filesystem? How much of /var can be moved to a zfs filesystem without
causing boot or runtime
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:25 AM, Darryl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MB $134.99
ASUS M2N-SLI Deluxe AM2 NVIDIA nForce 570 SLI MCP ATX AMD Motherboard - Retail
http://www.newegg.com/Product/...Item=N82E16813131013
[..]
Video Card $19.99
ASUS EN6200LE/TC256/TD/64 GeForce 6200LE 256MB(64MB on Board)
Justin,
Thanks for the reply
In the environment I currently work in, the powers
that be are almost
completely anti unix. Installing the nfs client on
all machines would take
a real good sales pitch. None the less I am still
I've pro unix I'm against putting NFS on all the PC clients
Justin Vassallo wrote:
Thommy,
If I read correctly your post stated that the pools did not automount on
startup, not that they would go corrupt. It seems to me that Paulo is
actually experiencing a corrupt fs
Nah, I also had indications of corrupted data if you read my posts.
But the data
AGHH thank you all for your responses! Took me a while to figure out this
forum, as i was getting email responses and wasn't sure if i needed to reply
here, so i apologize to those i emailed personally!!
As advised by Brandon, the miniatx boards would have a lower power consumption,
so i
In our system, we need to migrating from UFS in a short time.
according to the ZFS_Best_Practices_Guide. before migration, we should unshared
the UFS, and then umount the ZFS,and then do migration, which means during
migration, the service on the machine should stop. but we can't afford the
(2) You want a 64-bit CPU. So that probably rules
out your P4 machines,
unless they were extremely late-model P4s with the
EM64T features.
Given that file-serving alone is relatively low-CPU,
you can get away
with practically any 64-bit capable CPU made in the
last 4 years.
Assuming
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Darryl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have read that PSU's that come with cases are far from reliable? Is this
truly the case?
Inexpensive cases have inexpensive power supplies.
Most of the Antec cases come with good power supplies. I have a
Thermaltake Matrix
Hi,
Using the opensolaris installer I've created a raidz array from two 500GB hdds,
but the installer keeps seening two hdds, not the array I've just made.
How do I install opensolaris on raidz array?
Thanks!
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Alex wrote:
Hi,
Using the opensolaris installer I've created a raidz array from two 500GB
hdds, but the installer keeps seening two hdds, not the array I've just made.
How do I install opensolaris on raidz array?
You don't. Today, only simple or mirrored vdevs are
usable for ZFS boot
Hi,
I'm running snv_86 on a Tyan S2882-D. This board has an onboard Sil3114 SATA
controller which I have been using for my ZFS pool. Now I am trying to use
Xen, and I am told that it doesn't work with IDE mode disk drivers; but the
3114 doesn't seem to have a native SATA mode (the BIOS just
On 02 June, 2008 - Scott L. Burson sent me these 0,8K bytes:
Hi,
I'm running snv_86 on a Tyan S2882-D. This board has an onboard
Sil3114 SATA controller which I have been using for my ZFS pool. Now
I am trying to use Xen, and I am told that it doesn't work with IDE
mode disk drivers; but
On 02 June, 2008 - Richard Elling sent me these 0,5K bytes:
Alex wrote:
Hi,
Using the opensolaris installer I've created a raidz array from two
500GB hdds, but the installer keeps seening two hdds, not the array
I've just made. How do I install opensolaris on raidz array?
You
zpool export blah
move stuff
zpool import blah
Great, thanks, sorry for the FAQ :)
Would still like advice on the 1420SA.
-- Scott
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Brandon High wrote:
Inexpensive cases have inexpensive power supplies.
Most of the Antec cases come with good power supplies. I have a
Thermaltake Matrix case that came with a PSU and it's been reliable
for 2 years. I believe the case and PSU was about $100.
I just picked up an Antec
Consider a motherboard based on the R690G/SB600 chipset or the nVidia 7050.
The ASUS M2A-VM (690) is $70 and has on board video. I think only the
sound is not supported. Likewise the nVidia ASUS M2N-VM (7050) is $70.
I believe both have only 4 SATA ports, but that should be ok for your
Never mind, I see the 1420SA doesn't work. (Search Google for 1420sa
solaris.)
The Supermicro AOC-SAT2-MV8 seems to be the recommended choice.
-- Scott
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Scott L. Burson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would still like advice on the 1420SA.
It's been mentioned before. The 1420SA does not work.
-B
--
Brandon High [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The good is the enemy of the best. - Nietzsche
Sata Controller (26.99)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816132008
Asus M2A-VM (79.99)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131174
CPU $39.99
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103199
Case $49.99
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Darryl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sata Controller (26.99)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816132008
You may need to flash the BIOS on this card to disable the RAID
features. I think you can get the correct image from the Silicon Image
website.
Richard Elling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
E. Mike Durbin wrote:
Is there a way to to a create a zfs file system
(e.g. zpool create boot /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s1)
Then, (after vacating the old boot disk) add
another
device and make the zpool a mirror?
I dont know what hapenned to the thread, i can only read up to the 6th post...
But i have narrowed down my hardware for my build, and will commence purchasing
it all slowly. Thank you to all that have assisted me! I am apologizing in
advance, as i know when i have my equipment, i'll be
This thread really messed me up, posts dont follow a chronological order... so
sorry for all the extra posts!
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Silvio Armando Davi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I create a pool mirrored with 1gb of space. After I create a file
system in that pool and put a file (file1) of 300MB it that file
system. After that, I create a snapshot in the file system. With the
zfs list command the space used by the
Well, finally managed to solve my issue, thanks to the invaluable help of
Victor Latushkin, who I can't thank enough.
I'll post a more detailed step-by-step record of what he and I did (well, all
credit to him actually) to solve this. Actually, the problem is still there
(destroying a huge
Hernan Freschi hjf at hjf.com.ar writes:
Here's the output. Numbers may be a little off because I'm doing a nightly
build and compressing a crashdump with bzip2 at the same time.
Thanks. Your disks look healthy. But one question: why is
c5t0/c5t1/c6t0/c6t1 when in another post you referred
42 matches
Mail list logo
