On Jun 2, 2008, at 3:24 AM 6/2/, Erik Trimble wrote: > Keith Bierman wrote: >> On May 30, 2008, at 6:59 PM, Erik Trimble wrote: >> >> >>> The only drawback of the older Socket 940 Opterons is that they >>> don't >>> support the hardware VT extensions, so running a Windows guest >>> under xVM >>> on them isn't currently possible. >>> >> > > That is correct. VirtualBox does _not_ require the VT extensions. > I was referring to xVM, which I'm still taking as synonymous with > the Xen-based system. xVM _does_ require the VT hardware > extensions to run guest OSes in an unmodified form, which currently > includes all flavors of Windows. >
Ah, Marketing rebranding befuddles again. It's Sun xVM VirtualBox (tm) as best I can tell from sun.com. So I assumed you were using the xVM in generic sense, not as Xen vs. Virtual Box. -- Keith H. Bierman [EMAIL PROTECTED] | AIM kbiermank 5430 Nassau Circle East | Cherry Hills Village, CO 80113 | 303-997-2749 <speaking for myself*> Copyright 2008 _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
