On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Jim Klimov jimkli...@cos.ru wrote:
If MTBFs were real, we'd never see disks failing within a year ;)
Remember that MTBF (and MTTR and MTTDL) are *statistics* and not
guarantees. If a type of drive has an MTBF of 10 years, then the MEAN
(average) time between
Over the past few months I have seen mention of FreeBSD a couple
time in regards to ZFS. My question is how stable (reliable) is ZFS on
this platform ?
This is for a home server and the reason I am asking is that about
a year ago I bought some hardware based on it's inclusion on the
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Paul Kraus p...@kraus-haus.org wrote:
Over the past few months I have seen mention of FreeBSD a couple
time in regards to ZFS. My question is how stable (reliable) is ZFS on
this platform ?
This is for a home server and the reason I am asking is that
On Wed, 18 May 2011, Paul Kraus wrote:
Over the past few months I have seen mention of FreeBSD a couple
time in regards to ZFS. My question is how stable (reliable) is ZFS on
this platform ?
This would be a very excellent question to ask on the related FreeBSD
mailing list
Hi,
I am using FreeBSD 8.2 in production with ZFS. Although I have had
one issue with it in the past but I would recommend it and I consider
it production ready. That said if you can wait for FreeBSD 8.3 or 9.0
to come out (a few months away) you will get a better system as these
will
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Paul Kraus p...@kraus-haus.org wrote:
Over the past few months I have seen mention of FreeBSD a couple
time in regards to ZFS. My question is how stable (reliable) is ZFS on
this platform ?
ZFSv15, as shipped with FreeBSD 8.3, is rock stable in our uses. We
The drives I just bought were half packed in white foam then wrapped
in bubble wrap. Not all edges were protected with more than bubble
wrap.
Same here for me. I purchased 10 x 2TB Hitachi 7200rpm SATA disks from
Newegg.com in March. The majority of the drives were protected in white
foam.
On Wed, 18 May 2011, Chris Mosetick wrote:
to go in the packing dept. I still love their prices!
There's a reason fort at: you don't get what you don't pay for!
--
Rich Teer, Publisher
Vinylphile Magazine
www.vinylphilemag.com
___
zfs-discuss
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Paul Kraus p...@kraus-haus.org wrote:
P.S. If anyone here has a suggestion as to how to get Solaris to load
I would love to hear it. I even tried disabling multi-cores (which
makes the CPUs look like dual core instead of quad) with no change. I
have not been
We might have a better change of diagnosing your problem if we had a copy of
your panic message buffer. Have you considered OpenIndiana and illumos as an
option, or even NexentaStor if you are just looking for a storage appliance
(though my guess is that you need more general purpose compute
Wow- so a bit of an update:
With the default scrub delay:
echo zfs_scrub_delay/K | mdb -kw
zfs_scrub_delay:20004
pool0 14.1T 25.3T165499 1.28M 2.88M
pool0 14.1T 25.3T146 0 1.13M 0
pool0 14.1T 25.3T147 0 1.14M 0
pool0 14.1T
Don,
Try setting the zfs_scrub_delay to 1 but increase the
zfs_top_maxinflight to something like 64.
Thanks,
George
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Donald Stahl d...@blacksun.org wrote:
Wow- so a bit of an update:
With the default scrub delay:
echo zfs_scrub_delay/K | mdb -kw
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Edward Ned Harvey
New problem:
I'm following all the advice I summarized into the OP of this thread, and
testing on a test system. (A laptop). And it's just not working. I am
jumping
Try setting the zfs_scrub_delay to 1 but increase the
zfs_top_maxinflight to something like 64.
The array is running some regression tests right now but when it
quiets down I'll try that change.
-Don
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
Try setting the zfs_scrub_delay to 1 but increase the
zfs_top_maxinflight to something like 64.
With the delay set to 1 or higher it doesn't matter what I set the
maxinflight value to- when I check with:
echo ::walk spa | ::print spa_t spa_name spa_last_io spa_scrub_inflight
The value returned
15 matches
Mail list logo
