> I have a SAS array with a zfs pool on it. zfs automatically searches for
> and mounts the zfs pool I've created there. I want to attach another
> host to this array, but it doesn't have any provision for zones or the
> like. (Like you would find in an FC array or in the switch infrastructure.)
> > bonus questions: any idea when hot spares will make it to S10?
>
> good question :)
It'll be in U3, and probably available as patches for U2 as well.
The reason for U2 patches is Thumper (x4500), because we want ZFS
on Thumper to have hot spares and double-parity RAID-Z from day one.
Jeff
_
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 10:41:10PM -0700, Frank Cusack wrote:
> On July 28, 2006 11:59:50 AM +1000 grant beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >ZFS won't automatically import a pool unless it is explicitly exported
> >first via "zfs export", so it should be safe to do this, but it has to
> >be
On July 28, 2006 11:59:50 AM +1000 grant beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ZFS won't automatically import a pool unless it is explicitly exported
first via "zfs export", so it should be safe to do this, but it has to
be done at the pool level, not the filesystem level.
Just to clarify, that w
> I've a non-mirrored zfs file systems which shows the status below. I saw
> the thread in the archives about working this out but it looks like ZFS
> messages have changed. How do I find out what file(s) this is?
> [...]
> errors: The following persistent errors have been detected:
>
>
I've a non-mirrored zfs file systems which shows the status below. I saw
the thread in the archives about working this out but it looks like ZFS
messages have changed. How do I find out what file(s) this is?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:] uname -a
SunOS nevada 5.11 snv_38 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10
[EMAI
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 08:17:03PM -0500, Malahat Qureshi wrote:
> Is there any way to boot of from zfs disk "work around" ??
Yes, see
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/tabriz?entry=are_you_ready_to_rumble
--mat
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@o
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 06:35:06PM -0700, Frank Cusack wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a SAS array with a zfs pool on it. zfs automatically searches for
> and mounts the zfs pool I've created there. I want to attach another
> host to this array, but it doesn't have any provision for zones or the
> like.
Hi
I have a SAS array with a zfs pool on it. zfs automatically searches for
and mounts the zfs pool I've created there. I want to attach another
host to this array, but it doesn't have any provision for zones or the
like. (Like you would find in an FC array or in the switch infrastructure.)
W
Is there any way to boot of from zfs disk "work around" ??
regards,
Malahat
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since ZFS is COW, can I have a read-only pool (on a central file
server, or on a DVD, etc) with a separate block-differential pool on
my local hard disk to store writes?
This way, the pool in use can be read-write, even if the main pool
itself is read-only, with
Hi Robert,
The fix for 6424554 is being backported to S10 and will be available in
S10U3, later this year.
-- Fred
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello zfs-discuss,
Is someone working on a backport (patch) to S10? Any timeframe?
begin:vcard
fn:Fred Zlotnick
n:Zlotnick;Fred
org:Sun Microsystems, I
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 03:54:02PM -0400, Christine Tran wrote:
> - What is the compression algorithm used?
It is based on the Lempel-Ziv algorithm.
> - Is there a ZFS feature that will output the real uncompressed size of
> the data? The scenario is if they had to move a compressed ZFS
> file
On 7/27/06, Darren Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> one more time with the attachment
I wouldn't say that either system had "Raid-5". Both raid-4 and raid-z
have significant differences in how they work from raid-5.
Netapp certainly has quotas, but they're not as flexible as ZFS.
Can you e
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 10:17:47AM -0700, Praveen Mogili wrote:
> S10 and ZFS is opensource is great but If there is
> some solid material with technical detailsI would
> really appreciate it.
The ZFS on-disk file format is here:
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/docs/ondiskformatfinal.
> one more time with the attachment
I wouldn't say that either system had "Raid-5". Both raid-4 and raid-z
have significant differences in how they work from raid-5.
Netapp certainly has quotas, but they're not as flexible as ZFS.
Can you explain more what you mean by 'Raw device' and 'volume s
From a RAS perspective, ZFS's end-to-end data integrity feature is critical.
If the competing file system doesn't have this capability, then they can't play
in this sandbox.
-- richard
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail
James,
This might be interesting to add to the file system
wikipedia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems
I don't see WAFL there...
Bev.
James Dickens wrote:
one more time with the attachment
On 7/27/06, James Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/27/06, Pra
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 06:30:46PM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> ... but I have to ask.
>
> How do I back this up?
The following two RFEs would help you out enormously:
6421958 want recursive zfs send ('zfs send -r')
6421959 want zfs send to preserve properties ('zfs send -p')
As far as RFEs
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 02:12:09AM -0700, Steve Bennett wrote:
> > How did you measure it? (I'm not saying it doesn't
> > take those 45kB - just I haven't checked it myself
> > and I wonder how you checked it).
>
> ran 'top', looked at 'mem free'
> created 1000 filesystems
> ran 'top' again.
> reb
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 08:20:56PM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote:
> btw: I belive it was discussed here before - it would be great if one
> would automatically convert given directory on zfs filesystem into zfs
> filesystem (without actually copying all data)
Yep, and an RFE filed: 6400399 want "
Hi there,
Customer has some questions regarding ZFS compression.
- What is the compression algorithm used?
- How much space saving, ballpark?
(I said it depends on the data but customer still wants to know if we
have stats.)
- Is there a ZFS feature that will output the real uncompressed siz
one more time with the attachment
On 7/27/06, James Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/27/06, Praveen Mogili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I m sure some of you may have heard this already
> ' ZFS is a reverse engineered WAFL'
> from NetApp guys. If not, you will soon...
>
> Has any
Eric Schrock wrote:
Upon closer inspection, we found that this scenario should work with
the current upgrade solution. What will definitely not work is to
delegate a ZFS dataset to a local zone, and then place system software
(i.e. Solaris package contents) within such a filesystem. This should
On 7/27/06, Praveen Mogili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I m sure some of you may have heard this already
' ZFS is a reverse engineered WAFL'
from NetApp guys. If not, you will soon...
Has anyone put together a white paper or a
presentation or some bullet points positioning ZFS vs
WAFL.
S10
Timing is everything :-)
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-6612
-- richard
Richard Elling wrote:
Craig Morgan wrote:
Spare a thought also for the remote serviceability aspects of these
systems, if customers raise calls/escalations against such systems
then our remote support/solution cent
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:02:14PM -0700, Andrew wrote:
> Since ZFS is COW, can I have a read-only pool (on a central file
> server, or on a DVD, etc) with a separate block-differential pool on
> my local hard disk to store writes?
>
> This way, the pool in use can be read-write, even if the main p
Matty wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Eric Schrock wrote:
The original reasoning was that we didn't have enough time to validate
the behavior of the zone upgrade tools with ZFS as the root filesystem,
particularly as these tools (Ashanti, Zulu) are a moving target.
Upon closer inspection, we foun
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:23:21PM -0700, Andrew wrote:
> Do an automatic pool snapshot (using the recursive atomic snapshot
> feature that Matt Ahrens implemented recently, taking time
> proportional to the number of filesystems in the pool) upon every txg
> commit.
This is a good idea, one that
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Eric Schrock wrote:
The original reasoning was that we didn't have enough time to validate
the behavior of the zone upgrade tools with ZFS as the root filesystem,
particularly as these tools (Ashanti, Zulu) are a moving target.
Upon closer inspection, we found that this sc
The original reasoning was that we didn't have enough time to validate
the behavior of the zone upgrade tools with ZFS as the root filesystem,
particularly as these tools (Ashanti, Zulu) are a moving target.
Upon closer inspection, we found that this scenario should work with
the current upgrade s
Hi,
I m sure some of you may have heard this already
' ZFS is a reverse engineered WAFL'
from NetApp guys. If not, you will soon...
Has anyone put together a white paper or a
presentation or some bullet points positioning ZFS vs
WAFL.
S10 and ZFS is opensource is great but If there is
some sol
I saw this question over in zones-discuss and thought the ZFS
team could add something useful. If I read the caution right,
I'll have to re-think my disk allocation strategy...
--
Rich Teer, SCNA, SCSA, OpenSolaris CAB member
President,
Rite Online Inc.
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URL: http://www
Karsten Hashimoto wrote:
I would urgently need a Cluster Filesystem that runs with Oracle Clusterware.
Today, we would recommend the Sun Cluster Advanced Edition for Oracle RAC.
This includes QFS which is a distributed file system. See
http://www.sun.com/software/cluster/faq.xml#q21
Currently
I would urgently need a Cluster Filesystem that runs with Oracle Clusterware.
Currently Cluster Filesystems with Solaris need very expensive solutions (like
Veritas Storage Foundation or SUN Cluster) that are no longer accepted by the
customers (with regard to Linux solutions).
That's why I want
For S10U3, RR is 11/13/06 and GA is 11/27/06.
Gary
Bennett, Steve wrote:
Eric said:
For U3, these are the performance fixes:
6424554 full block re-writes need not read data in
6440499 zil should avoid txg_wait_synced() and use dmu_sync()
to issue
parallelIOs when fsyncing
64473
Eric said:
> For U3, these are the performance fixes:
> 6424554 full block re-writes need not read data in
> 6440499 zil should avoid txg_wait_synced() and use dmu_sync()
> to issue
> parallelIOs when fsyncing
> 6447377 ZFS prefetch is inconsistant
> 6373978 want to take lots of snapshots quickly
Hello eric,
Thursday, July 27, 2006, 4:34:16 AM, you wrote:
ek> Robert Milkowski wrote:
>>Hello George,
>>
>>Wednesday, July 26, 2006, 7:27:04 AM, you wrote:
>>
>>
>>GW> Additionally, I've just putback the latest feature set and bugfixes
>>GW> which will be part of s10u3_03. There were some add
38 matches
Mail list logo
