Hello Jason,
Sunday, January 14, 2007, 1:26:37 AM, you wrote:
JJWW Hi Robert,
JJWW Will build 54 offline the drive?
IIRC there hasn't been ZFS+FMA integration yet.
--
Best regards,
Robertmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Since they have installed a second path to our Hitachi SAN, my Mac OS X Server
4.8 mounts every SAN disk twice.
I asked everywhere, if there's a way, to correct that. And the only answer so
far was, that I need a volume manager, that can be configured to consider two
volumes as being
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 11:00:36AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been looking at zfs source trying to get up to speed on the
internals. One thing that interests me about the fs is what appears to be
a low hanging fruit for block squishing CAS (Content
Hello Philip,
Monday, January 15, 2007, 10:44:49 AM, you wrote:
PM Hi,
PM Since they have installed a second path to our Hitachi SAN, my
PM Mac OS X Server 4.8 mounts every SAN disk twice.
PM I asked everywhere, if there's a way, to correct that. And the
PM only answer so far was, that I need
Hi, are there currently any plans to make an iSCSI target created by
setting shareiscsi=on on a zvol
bindable to a single interface (setting tpgt or acls)?
I can cobble something together with ipfilter,
but that doesn't give me enough granularity to say something like:
'host a can see target 1,
I have no hands-on experience with ZFS but have a question. If the
file server running ZFS exports the ZFS file system via NFS to
clients, based on previous messages on this list, it is not possible
for an NFS client to mount this NFS-exported ZFS file system on
multiple directories on the NFS
Jonathan Edwards writes:
On Jan 5, 2007, at 11:10, Anton B. Rang wrote:
DIRECT IO is a set of performance optimisations to circumvent
shortcomings of a given filesystem.
Direct I/O as generally understood (i.e. not UFS-specific) is an
optimization which allows data to
Go poke around in the multipath Xsan storage pool properties. Specifies how
Xsan uses multiple Fibre Channel paths between clients and storage. This is
the equiv of Veritas DMP or [whatever we now call] Solaris MPxIO
/d
2007/1/15, Philip Mötteli [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Monday, January 15,
Richard Elling wrote:
roland wrote:
i have come across an interesting article at :
http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=2859p=5
Can anyone comment on the claims or conclusions of the article itself?
It seems to me that they are not always clear about what they are
talking about.
Robert Milkowski wrote:
2. I belive it's definitely possible to just correct your config under
Mac OS without any need to use other fs or volume manager, however
going to zfs could be a good idea anyway
That implies that MacOS has some sort of native SCSI multipathing like
Solaris Mpxio.
On Jan 15, 2007, at 8:34 AM, Dick Davies wrote:
Hi, are there currently any plans to make an iSCSI target created by
setting shareiscsi=on on a zvol
bindable to a single interface (setting tpgt or acls)?
I can cobble something together with ipfilter,
but that doesn't give me enough
Hi Torrey,
I think it does if you buy Xsan. Its still a separate product isn't
it? Thought its more like QFS + MPXIO.
Best Regards,
Jason
On 1/15/07, Torrey McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Milkowski wrote:
2. I belive it's definitely possible to just correct your config under
Mac
Hi Roch,
You mentioned improved ZFS performance in the latest Nevada build (60
right now?)...I was curious if one would notice much of a performance
improvement between 54 and 60? Also, does anyone think the zfs_arc_max
tunable-support will be made available as a patch to S10U3, or would
that
Got me. However, transport multipathing - Like Mpxio, DLM, VxDMP, etc. -
is usually separated from the filesystem layers.
Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
Hi Torrey,
I think it does if you buy Xsan. Its still a separate product isn't
it? Thought its more like QFS + MPXIO.
Best Regards,
Jason
On
Hello Albert,
Monday, January 15, 2007, 5:55:23 PM, you wrote:
AC I have no hands-on experience with ZFS but have a question. If the
AC file server running ZFS exports the ZFS file system via NFS to
AC clients, based on previous messages on this list, it is not possible
AC for an NFS client to
Hi Torrey,
Looks like its got a half-way decent multipath design:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=Xsan/1.1/en/c3xs12.html
Whether or not it works is another story I suppose. ;-)
Best Regards,
Jason
On 1/15/07, Torrey McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Got me. However, transport
On January 15, 2007 11:58:10 AM -0800 Andrew Pattison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The SATA frame work has laready been integrated and is available on
Solaris 10 Update 3 and Nevada.
update 2 as well, yes? I thought U2 is when the first SATA support
was announced, for the Marvell controller.
Kyle McDonald wrote:
Richard Elling wrote:
roland wrote:
i have come across an interesting article at :
http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=2859p=5
Can anyone comment on the claims or conclusions of the article itself?
It seems to me that they are not always clear about what they are
On 1/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dick Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/10/2007 05:26:45 AM:
On 08/01/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that in addition to lzjb compression, squishing blocks that
contain
the same data would buy a lot of space
Go poke around in the multipath Xsan storage pool
properties. Specifies
how Xsan uses multiple Fibre Channel paths between
clients and storage.
This is the equiv of Veritas DMP or [whatever we now
call] Solaris MPxIO
You mean, I should find some configuration file? Well, I can't find one.
Robert Milkowski wrote:
2. I belive it's definitely possible to just
correct your config under
Mac OS without any need to use other fs or volume
manager, however
going to zfs could be a good idea anyway
That implies that MacOS has some sort of native SCSI
multipathing like
Looks like its got a half-way decent multipath
design:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=Xsan/1.1/
en/c3xs12.html
Great, but that is with Xsan. If I don't exchange our Hitachi with an Xsan, I
don't have this 'cvadmin'.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
22 matches
Mail list logo
