So, since you are using the ahci driver, does your cfgadm output show sata
devices too? =)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 06:21:40PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 06:11:36PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 06:09:46PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
But still, how is tar/SSH any more multi-threaded than tar/NFS?
It's not that it is, but that NFS
Try mounting the other way, so you read form NFS and write to ZFS (~DAS). That
should perform significantly better.
NFS write is slow (compared to read) because of syncronous ack.
If you for some reason cant mount the other way, then you may want to play with
NFS mount-options for write-buffer
Pål Baltzersen wrote:
Try mounting the other way, so you read form NFS and write to ZFS (~DAS). That
should perform significantly better.
NFS write is slow (compared to read) because of syncronous ack.
If you for some reason cant mount the other way, then you may want to play with
NFS
What if your HW-RAID-controller dies? in say 2 years or more..
What will read your disks as a configured RAID? Do you know how to
(re)configure the controller or restore the config without destroying your
data? Do you know for sure that a spare-part and firmware will be identical, or
at least
On 5/22/07, Pål Baltzersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What if your HW-RAID-controller dies? in say 2 years or more..
What will read your disks as a configured RAID? Do you know how to (re)configure the
controller or restore the config without destroying your data? Do you know for sure
that a
allyourbase
Take off every ZIL!
http://number9.hellooperator.net/articles/2007/02/12/zil-communication
/allyourbase
On 22/05/07, Albert Chin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 06:11:36PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 06:09:46PM -0500, Albert Chin
On 22-May-07, at 11:01 AM, Louwtjie Burger wrote:
On 5/22/07, Pål Baltzersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What if your HW-RAID-controller dies? in say 2 years or more..
What will read your disks as a configured RAID? Do you know how to
(re)configure the controller or restore the config without
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 10:04:34AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 06:21:40PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 06:11:36PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 06:09:46PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
But still, how is tar/SSH any
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 13:23:48 -0800, Marion Hakanson wrote:
Albert Chin wrote:
Why can't the NFS performance match that of SSH?
My first guess is the NFS vs array cache-flush issue. Have you
configured the 6140 to ignore SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE requests? That'll
make a huge difference for NFS
MachineMB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU
/sec %CPU
/fastsan/zfs3 (with 3 snapshots and a clone)
100 5414 98.8 31819 58.9 46620 95.4 2895 98.8 100516 99.8
7490.8 172.3
/fastsan/zfs3 (with 1 snapshot and a clone)
100 5316 97.5 65448 99.7 50097 99.0
For the moment, SolarisCluster 3.2 does not support using AVS replication
within a cluster for failover of storage. We do support using storage based
replication for failover data with high end Hitachi based storage.
Also at this point SolarisCluster does not ship with support for zfs send.
You
12 matches
Mail list logo
