Thanks for your reassuring post, loomy :)
I'm pretty sure the reason for all this is some bad hardware..
But I can't get VTS to work, looks like its not supported for this kind of
hardware.
And in order to run some other stresstest software or something I would have to
connect monitor, keyboard
> OK, thanks. I still haven't got any answer to my original question,
> though. I.e., is there some way to know what text the
> filename is, or do I have to make a more or less wild guess what
> encoding the program that created the file used?
You have to guess. As far as I know, Apple's HFS (and
thank you so much. that fixed it all. i've been at it for 3 days now.
cheers,
abs
Marion Hakanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> i am a little new to zfs so please excuse my ignorance. i have a poweredge
> 2950 running Nevada B82 with an Apple Xraid attached over a fi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> i am a little new to zfs so please excuse my ignorance. i have a poweredge
> 2950 running Nevada B82 with an Apple Xraid attached over a fiber hba. they
> are formatted to JBOD with the pool configured as follows:
> . . .
> i have a filesystem (tpool4/seplog) shared ove
hello all,
i am a little new to zfs so please excuse my ignorance. i have a poweredge
2950 running Nevada B82 with an Apple Xraid attached over a fiber hba. they
are formatted to JBOD with the pool configured as follows:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
t
Boyd Adamson wrote:
> Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Tim wrote:
>>
>>> The greatest hammer in the world will be inferior to a drill when
>>> driving a screw :)
>>>
>>>
>> The greatest hammer in the world is a rotary hammer, and it
>> works quite well for driving scr
Marcus Sundman wrote:
> Bart Smaalders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I'm unable to find more info about this. E.g., what does "reject
>>> file names" mean in practice? E.g., if a program tries to create a
>>> file using an utf8-incompatible filename, what happens? Does the
>>> fopen() fail? Would
I found this feature to be incredibly useful when managing a Digital Unix
system with AdsFS. Migrating to a larger disk (or larger hardware RAID set)
was a simple "add", "remove" and wait for the filesystem to clean up. This was
done with multiple users online. Good Stuff !
Keep up the good
Hm -
Based on this detail from the page:
Change lever for switching between "Rotation
+ Hammering" , "Neutral" and "Hammering only"
I'd hope it could still hammer... Though I'd suspect the size of nails
it would hammer would be somewhat limited... ;)
Nathan.
Boyd Adamson wrote:
> Richard E
Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tim wrote:
>>
>> The greatest hammer in the world will be inferior to a drill when
>> driving a screw :)
>>
>
> The greatest hammer in the world is a rotary hammer, and it
> works quite well for driving screws or digging through degenerate
> granite ;-)
Tim wrote:
>
> The greatest hammer in the world will be inferior to a drill when
> driving a screw :)
>
The greatest hammer in the world is a rotary hammer, and it
works quite well for driving screws or digging through degenerate
granite ;-) Need a better analogy.
Here's what I use (quite often)
Roch Bourbonnais wrote:
>
> Le 28 févr. 08 à 21:00, Jonathan Loran a écrit :
>
>>
>>
>> Roch Bourbonnais wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 28 févr. 08 à 20:14, Jonathan Loran a écrit :
>>>
Quick question:
If I create a ZFS mirrored pool, will the read performance get a
boost?
In ot
Le 28 févr. 08 à 21:00, Jonathan Loran a écrit :
>
>
> Roch Bourbonnais wrote:
>>
>> Le 28 févr. 08 à 20:14, Jonathan Loran a écrit :
>>
>>>
>>> Quick question:
>>>
>>> If I create a ZFS mirrored pool, will the read performance get a
>>> boost?
>>> In other words, will the data/parity be read r
On 2/28/08, Alan Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Tim wrote:
>
> > Don't forget, ZFS is open source, and can be ported to any other
> > number of platforms as well. It's also currently supported on FreeBSD
> > 7.0, and is basically production ready on that platform.
> >
> > The open source is
Roch Bourbonnais wrote:
>
> Le 28 févr. 08 à 20:14, Jonathan Loran a écrit :
>
>>
>> Quick question:
>>
>> If I create a ZFS mirrored pool, will the read performance get a boost?
>> In other words, will the data/parity be read round robin between the
>> disks, or do both mirrored sets of data and
Le 28 févr. 08 à 20:14, Jonathan Loran a écrit :
>
> Quick question:
>
> If I create a ZFS mirrored pool, will the read performance get a
> boost?
> In other words, will the data/parity be read round robin between the
> disks, or do both mirrored sets of data and parity get read off of
> both
Jonathan Loran writes:
>
> Quick question:
>
> If I create a ZFS mirrored pool, will the read performance get a boost?
Yes. I use a stripe of mirrors to get better read and write performance.
Ian.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@openso
On 2/28/08, Alan Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim wrote:
>
> > Don't forget, ZFS is open source, and can be ported to any other
> > number of platforms as well. It's also currently supported on FreeBSD
> > 7.0, and is basically production ready on that platform.
> >
> > The open source is HU
Quick question:
If I create a ZFS mirrored pool, will the read performance get a boost?
In other words, will the data/parity be read round robin between the
disks, or do both mirrored sets of data and parity get read off of both
disks? The latter case would have a CPU expense, so I would thi
Tim wrote:
> Don't forget, ZFS is open source, and can be ported to any other
> number of platforms as well. It's also currently supported on FreeBSD
> 7.0, and is basically production ready on that platform.
>
> The open source is HUGE in my mind, you aren't tied to Solaris.
> Granted, that
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> Is it possible to create a ZFS pool using a backing file created in
> xattr space?
Why would you want to do that ?
I tried but could get it to work with the CLI. However it may be
possible via the (private) libzfs function call interface.
da64-x4500b-gmp03# cd /tmp
da
Is it possible to create a ZFS pool using a backing file created in
xattr space?
Bob
==
Bob Friesenhahn
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
___
Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
>
> Doing the same as an alternate "view" on snapshot space would be a
> simple matter of programming within ZFS, though the magic token/suffix
> to get you into version/snapshot space would likely not be POSIX
> compliant..
>
>
We already have a POSIX compliant file syst
Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
> Kyle McDonald wrote:
>> Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 13:43 -0500, Kyle McDonald wrote:
>>>
How was it MVFS could do this without any changes to the shells or
any other programs?
I ClearCase could 'grep FOO /dir1/dir2/file@@/main/
Kyle McDonald wrote:
> Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 13:43 -0500, Kyle McDonald wrote:
>>
>>> How was it MVFS could do this without any changes to the shells or any
>>> other programs?
>>>
>>> I ClearCase could 'grep FOO /dir1/dir2/file@@/main/*' to see which
>>> version of
> So I scrubbed the whole pool and it found a lot more corrupted files.
My condolences :)
General questions and comments about ZFS and data corruption:
I thought RAIDZ would correct data errors automatically with the parity data.
How wrong am I on that? Perhaps a parity correction was alrea
>I suspected it should be 'possible' to code it into ZFS.
>
>The reason it's been left to runat instead seems to be POSIX compliance
>then?
It could still have used "//" pathnames (those have a POSIX reserved
special meaning though that somewhat complicates pathname composition).
E.g., a pathna
Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 13:43 -0500, Kyle McDonald wrote:
>
>> How was it MVFS could do this without any changes to the shells or any
>> other programs?
>>
>> I ClearCase could 'grep FOO /dir1/dir2/file@@/main/*' to see which
>> version of 'file' added FOO.
>> (I think
Bart Smaalders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm unable to find more info about this. E.g., what does "reject
> > file names" mean in practice? E.g., if a program tries to create a
> > file using an utf8-incompatible filename, what happens? Does the
> > fopen() fail? Would this normally be a probl
On 2/28/08, Christine Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Alan Perry wrote:
> > Alan Perry wrote:
> >
> > > I gave a talk on ZFS at a local user group meeting this evening.
> > What I didn't
> > > know going in was that the meeting was hosted at a Novell consulting
> > shop. I got
> > > asked a
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 13:43 -0500, Kyle McDonald wrote:
> How was it MVFS could do this without any changes to the shells or any
> other programs?
>
> I ClearCase could 'grep FOO /dir1/dir2/file@@/main/*' to see which
> version of 'file' added FOO.
> (I think @@ was the special hidden key. It
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 07:55:45AM -0800, Joe Blount wrote:
> * Application aware/driven CDP solves the file sanity challenge by
> being explicitly told by the app. But this will have an inherently
> limited market because it relies on application support. Basically:
> it works, but requires coor
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 04:05:50AM -0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> Again, there's nothing that I "wanted". I was only thinking. And I am
> a server person. Now, if I switch from the
> /export/home/userfoo/Documents (for Richard, who might be happier with
> UZFS-CDP than with the shots of TimeMachine), t
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Uwe Dippel wrote:
>
> 1. The application (NFS - sftp) does not know about the state of writing?
Sometimes applications know about the state of writing and sometimes
they do not. Sometimes they don't even know they are writing.
> 2. Obviously nobody sees anything in having a
> A good handful of people approached me later, being
> curious and fascinated by the idea to replace the
> backup scheduler with an event-driven creation of the
> versions.
Uwe,
I'm still struggling to decide if ADM is what you're looking for. When you
make comments like the one quoted above,
Alan Perry wrote:
> Alan Perry wrote:
>
> > I gave a talk on ZFS at a local user group meeting this evening.
> What I didn't
> > know going in was that the meeting was hosted at a Novell consulting
> shop. I got
> > asked a lot of "what does ZFS do that NSS doesn't do" questions that
> I c
Alan Perry wrote:
> I gave a talk on ZFS at a local user group meeting this evening.
What I didn't
> know going in was that the meeting was hosted at a Novell consulting
shop. I got
> asked a lot of "what does ZFS do that NSS doesn't do" questions that
I could not
> answer (mostly because
[i]Consider this to be your life's mission.[/i]
Bob, I can do without this.
Richard,
[i]Actually I use several browsers every day. Each
browser has a cache located somewhere in my home
directory and the cache is managed so that it won't
grow very large. With CDP, I would fill my disk in
a week o
S10U4 SPARC on V890 + patches, StorageTek 6140 + CSM200
Generic_127111-09
The same issue, still don't patched ?
If I set NOINUSE_CHECK=1
pool is created succesfully
Regards
--
Piotr (DrFugazi) Tarnowski
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Cyril Plisko wrote:
> >>
> >>
> http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/zfs-discuss/2540-zfs-performance.pdf
> >
> > Nov 26, 2008 ??? May I borrow your time machine ? ;-)
>
> Are there any stock prices you would like to know about? Perhaps you
>
> are inter
> So, I set utf8only=on and try to create a file with a
> filename that is
> a byte array that can't be decoded to text using
> UTF-8. What's supposed
> to happen? Should fopen(), or whatever syscall
> 'touch' uses, fail?
> Should the syscall somehow escape utf8-incompatible
> bytes, or maybe
> rep
41 matches
Mail list logo
