Blake blake.ir...@gmail.com writes:
Harry,
The LiveCD for OpenSolaris has a driver detection tool on it - this
will let you see if your hardware is supported without touching the
installed XP system.
Are you talking about the official Opensol-11 install iso or something
else?
A big
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
Are you talking about the official Opensol-11 install iso or something
else?
The official 2008.11 LiveCD has the tool on the default desktop as an icon.
A big issue with running a VM is that ZFS prefers direct access to
Blake wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
Are you talking about the official Opensol-11 install iso or something
else?
The official 2008.11 LiveCD has the tool on the default desktop as an icon.
No need, it is a Java app and you can run
Bob is right. Less chance of failure perhaps but also less
protection. I don't like it when my storage lies to me :)
Bob
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 27, 2009, at 12:48 PM, Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us
wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Blake wrote:
SinceZFS is trying to
After a liveupgrade and luactivate I can login to the -new- BE.
My question is: do I have to luactive the -old- BE again if I want to
chose that one from the grub menu or can I just run it if I want to.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS sxce snv107 ++
+
Blake wrote:
The official 2008.11 LiveCD has the tool on the default desktop as an icon.
Richard Elling wrote:
No need, it is a Java app and you can run it on multiple OSes.
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/hcts/device_detect.jsp
Its a little confusing to tell what to make of the report.
The
Blake blake.ir...@gmail.com writes:
Harry,
The LiveCD for OpenSolaris has a driver detection tool on it - this
will let you see if your hardware is supported without touching the
installed XP system.
That won't help much with the one piece of hardware I posted about in
OP:
Harry Putnam wrote:
Blake wrote:
The official 2008.11 LiveCD has the tool on the default desktop as an icon.
Richard Elling wrote:
No need, it is a Java app and you can run it on multiple OSes.
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/hcts/device_detect.jsp
Its a little confusing
Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.com writes:
Motherboards don't matter. It is what is on the motherboard that
matters. In your case, it looks like everything should work except
the VIA SATA RAID controller. Fortunately, the IDE controller is
supported, so you should be able to install it.
Just select it from GRUB menu during boot, if you can (keyboard and
display available)
Jiri
--
Jiri Navratil, http://www.navratil.cz, +420 777 224 245
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 08:29:49PM +0100, dick hoogendijk wrote:
After a liveupgrade and luactivate I can login to the -new- BE.
My question
I meant that the more layers you remove, the less layers there are
that can tell ZFS something that's not true. I guess ZFS would still
catch those errors in most cases - it would still be a pain to deal
with needless errors. Also I like to do what the manual says, and the
manual says avoid
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Blake wrote:
I meant that the more layers you remove, the less layers there are
that can tell ZFS something that's not true. I guess ZFS would still
catch those errors in most cases - it would still be a pain to deal
with needless errors. Also I like to do what the manual
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:59:02 -0700
cindy.swearin...@sun.com wrote:
Its your BE, you can run it if you want to. :-)
grin
Select the BE from the GRUB menu to boot from even if it isn't the
(lu)activated one.
Be sure that every BE that you want to boot from has been activated
and booted
Blake wrote:
Care to share any of those in advance? It might be cool to see input
from listees and generally get some wheels turning...
raidz boot support in grub 2 is pretty high on my list to be honest..
Which brings up another question of where is the raidz stuff mostly?
RaidZ grow support
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:23 PM, C. Bergström
cbergst...@netsyncro.comwrote:
Blake wrote:
Care to share any of those in advance? It might be cool to see input
from listees and generally get some wheels turning...
raidz boot support in grub 2 is pretty high on my
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Blake blake.ir...@gmail.com wrote:
A big issue with running a VM is that ZFS prefers direct access to storage.
VMWare can give VMs direct access to the actual disks. This should
avoid the overhead of using virtual disks.
-B
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
On Feb 27, 2009, at 18:23, C. Bergström wrote:
Blake wrote:
Care to share any of those in advance? It might be cool to see input
from listees and generally get some wheels turning...
raidz boot support in grub 2 is pretty high on my list to be honest..
Which brings up another question of
Brandon High bh...@freaks.com writes:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Blake blake.ir...@gmail.com wrote:
A big issue with running a VM is that ZFS prefers direct access to storage.
VMWare can give VMs direct access to the actual disks. This should
avoid the overhead of using virtual
David Magda wrote:
On Feb 27, 2009, at 18:23, C. Bergström wrote:
Blake wrote:
Care to share any of those in advance? It might be cool to see input
from listees and generally get some wheels turning...
raidz boot support in grub 2 is pretty high on my list to be honest..
Which brings up
zfs send is great for moving a filesystem with lots of tiny files,
since it just handles the blocks :)
I'd like to see:
pool-shrinking (and an option to shrink disk A when i want disk B to
become a mirror, but A is a few blocks bigger)
install to mirror from the liveCD gui
zfs recovery tools
Brandon makes a good point. I think that's an option to pursue if you
don't want to risk messing up your Windows install.
If you can, dedicate entire disks, rather that partitions, to ZFS.
It's easier to manage. ZFS is managed by the VMs processor in this
case, so you will take a bigger
Gnome GUI for desktop ZFS administration
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Blake blake.ir...@gmail.com wrote:
zfs send is great for moving a filesystem with lots of tiny files,
since it just handles the blocks :)
I'd like to see:
pool-shrinking (and an option to shrink disk A when i want
x86 snv 108
I have a pool with around 5300 file systems called home. I can do:
zfs set sharenfs=on home
however
zfs set sharenfs=sec=krb5,rw home
complains:
cannot set property for 'home': 'sharenfs' cannot be set to invalid options
I feel I must be overlooking something elementary.
On Feb 27, 2009, at 20:02, Richard Elling wrote:
It wouldn't help. zfs send is a data stream which contains parts of
files,
not files (in the usual sense), so there is no real way to take a send
stream and extract a file, other than by doing a receive.
If you create a non-incremental
Alastair Neil wrote:
x86 snv 108
I have a pool with around 5300 file systems called home. I can do:
zfs set sharenfs=on home
however
zfs set sharenfs=sec=krb5,rw home
complains:
cannot set property for 'home': 'sharenfs' cannot be set to invalid options
I feel I must be overlooking
Solaris 2008.11
r...@fsfs:/export/home/localddb/src/bup2# zfs send -R -I
bup-20090223-033745UTC z...@bup-20090225-184857utc foobar
r...@fsfs:/export/home/localddb/src/bup2# ls -l --si foobar
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.4G 2009-02-27 21:24 foobar
r...@fsfs:/export/home/localddb/src/bup2# zfs
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Tim Haley tim.ha...@sun.com wrote:
Alastair Neil wrote:
x86 snv 108
I have a pool with around 5300 file systems called home. I can do:
zfs set sharenfs=on home
however
zfs set sharenfs=sec=krb5,rw home
complains:
cannot set property for 'home':
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:25:42PM -0500, Alastair Neil wrote:
I can tell it's been a while since I did this - forgot to uncomment the
correct lines in /etc/nfssec.conf
You're not the only one who gets tripped up by this. If you use
kclient(1M) then that won't happen, but preferably
Hello,
I had intention to use ZFS with mirrored pools on external HDDs.
Unfortunatelly, I have some troubles to have it running as planned.
I'm enclosing my results so far. Please let me know, if some of
you have similar issues or not. Thank you.
Firstly, I can't access 1TB disks via FireWare.
David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
Solaris 2008.11
r...@fsfs:/export/home/localddb/src/bup2# zfs send -R -I
bup-20090223-033745UTC z...@bup-20090225-184857utc foobar
r...@fsfs:/export/home/localddb/src/bup2# ls -l --si foobar
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.4G 2009-02-27 21:24 foobar
David Magda wrote:
On Feb 27, 2009, at 20:02, Richard Elling wrote:
It wouldn't help. zfs send is a data stream which contains parts of
files,
not files (in the usual sense), so there is no real way to take a send
stream and extract a file, other than by doing a receive.
If you create a
Brian Hechinger wo...@4amlunch.net writes:
[...]
I think it would be better to answer this question that it would to
attempt to answer the VirtualBox question (I run it on a 64-bit OS,
so I can't really answer that anyway).
Thanks yes and appreciated here
The benefit to running ZFS on a
Marco Lopes marco.lo...@sun.com writes:
Correct, VirtualBox 2.1 and above will allow a 64 bit VM on top of a
32 bit host OS, but it requires a CPU with AMD-V or VT-x support.
Without the CPU virtualization extensions Virtualbox will only allow a
32 bit VM on a 32 bit host OS.
For the
Blake wrote:
Gnome GUI for desktop ZFS administration
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Blake blake.ir...@gmail.com wrote:
zfs send is great for moving a filesystem with lots of tiny files,
since it just handles the blocks :)
I'd like to see:
pool-shrinking (and an option to shrink
Blake wrote:
Gnome GUI for desktop ZFS administration
With the libzfs java bindings I am plotting a web based interface.. I'm
not sure if that would meet this gnome requirement though.. Knowing
specifically what you'd want to do in that interface would be good.. I
planned to compare it to
35 matches
Mail list logo
