Thanks for the help, but I cannot get it to work.
j...@opensolaris:~# zpool import
pool: vault
id: 8738898173956136656
state: UNAVAIL
status: One or more devices are missing from the system.
action: The pool cannot be imported. Attach the missing
devices and try again.
see:
Hello,
I want to slice these 3 disks into 2 partitions each and configure 1 Raid0 and
1 Raidz1 on these 3.
What exactly has to be done? Using format and fdisk I know but not exactly how
for this setup.
In case of disk failure: how do I replace the faulty one?
Thank you for a great product
I cannot import - that is the problem. :-(
I have read the discussions you referred to (and quite a few more), and also
about the logfix program. I also found a discussion where 'zpool import -FX'
solved a similar problem so I tried that but no luck.
Now I have read so many discussions and
I don't think that is the problem (but I am not sure). It seems like te problem
is that the ZIL is missing. It is there, but not recognized.
I used fdisk to create a 4GB partition of a SSD, and then added it to the pool
with the command 'zpool add vault log /dev/dsk/c10d0p1'.
When I try to
On 05/15/10 09:43 PM, Jason Barr wrote:
Hello,
I want to slice these 3 disks into 2 partitions each and configure 1 Raid0 and
1 Raidz1 on these 3.
Lets get the obvious question out of the way first: why?
If you intend one two way mirror and one raidz, you will either have to
waste one
- Jan Hellevik opensola...@janhellevik.com skrev:
I don't think that is the problem (but I am not sure). It seems like
te problem is that the ZIL is missing. It is there, but not
recognized.
I used fdisk to create a 4GB partition of a SSD, and then added it to
the pool with the command
I have done quite some research over the past few years on the best (ie.
simple, robust, inexpensive, and performant) SATA/SAS controllers for ZFS.
Especially in terms of throughput analysis (many of them are designed with an
insufficient PCIe link width). I have seen many questions on this
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:01:00AM +, Marc Bevand wrote:
I have done quite some research over the past few years on the best (ie.
simple, robust, inexpensive, and performant) SATA/SAS controllers for ZFS.
Especially in terms of throughput analysis (many of them are designed with an
Hi,
something like this
Disk # Slice 1 Slice 2
1 raid5 raid0
2 raid5 raid0
3 raid5 raid0
I want to have some fast scratch space (raid0) and some protected (raidz)
Greetings
J
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
- Jason Barr forum4...@arcor.de skrev:
Hi,
something like this
Disk #Slice 1 Slice 2
1 raid5 raid0
2 raid5 raid0
3 raid5 raid0
I want to have some fast scratch space (raid0) and some protected
(raidz)
svn_133 and zfs 22. At least my rpool is 22.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On May 15, 2010, at 2:53 AM, Jan Hellevik wrote:
I don't think that is the problem (but I am not sure). It seems like te
problem is that the ZIL is missing. It is there, but not recognized.
I used fdisk to create a 4GB partition of a SSD, and then added it to the
pool with the command
Very helpful. I just started to setup my system and have run into a problem
where my SATA port 7/8 aren't really SATA ports they are behind an unsupported
RAID controller, so I am in the market for a compatible controller.
Very helpful post.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Thanks! Not home right now, but I will try that as soon as I get home.
Message was edited by: janh
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
- Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.com skrev:
On May 15, 2010, at 2:53 AM, Jan Hellevik wrote:
I don't think that is the problem (but I am not sure). It seems like
te problem is that the ZIL is missing. It is there, but not
recognized.
I used fdisk to create a 4GB partition of
I'm also about to set up a small home server. This little box
http://www.fractal-design.com/?view=productprod=39
is able housing six 3,5 hdd's and also has one 2,5 bay, eg for an ssd.
Fine.
I need to know which SATA controller cards (both PCI and PCI-E) are
supported in OS, also I'd be
Ok,
I got it working: however I set up two partitions on each disk using fdisk
inside of format
what's the difference to slices (I checked with gparted)
Bye
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
It did not work. I did not find labels on p1, but on p0.
j...@opensolaris:~# zdb -l /dev/dsk/c10d0p1
LABEL 0
failed to unpack label 0
LABEL 1
- Jason Barr forum4...@arcor.de skrev:
Ok,
I got it working: however I set up two partitions on each disk using
fdisk inside of format
what's the difference to slices (I checked with gparted)
Both are supported, but from another post in here recently, it seems fdisk
partitions
- Annika annika...@telia.com skrev:
I'm also about to set up a small home server. This little box
http://www.fractal-design.com/?view=productprod=39
is able housing six 3,5 hdd's and also has one 2,5 bay, eg for an
ssd.
Fine.
I need to know which SATA controller cards (both PCI and
Can you recreate the problem with a second pool on a second set of
drives, like I described in my earlier post? Right now it seems like
your problem is mostly due to the missing log device. I'm wondering if
that missing log device is what messed up the initial move to the other
controller,
Howdy All,
I've a bit of a strange problem here. I have a filesystem with one snapshot
that simply refuses to be destroyed. The snapshots just prior to it and just
after it were destroyed without problem. While running the zfs destroy command
on this particular snapshot, the server becomes
On Sat, May 15 at 2:43, Jason Barr wrote:
Hello,
I want to slice these 3 disks into 2 partitions each and configure 1 Raid0 and
1 Raidz1 on these 3.
What exactly has to be done? Using format and fdisk I know but not exactly how
for this setup.
In case of disk failure: how do I replace the
Yes, I can try to do that. I do not have any more of this brand of disk, but I
guess that does not matter. It will have to wait until tomorrow (I have an
appointment in a few minutes, and it is getting late here in Norway), but I
will try first thing tomorrow. I guess a pool on a single drive
Jan Hellevik wrote:
Yes, I can try to do that. I do not have any more of this brand of disk, but I
guess that does not matter. It will have to wait until tomorrow (I have an
appointment in a few minutes, and it is getting late here in Norway), but I
will try first thing tomorrow. I guess a
Has anyone seen this type of problem? Any ideas?
Yeah, I've seen the same. Tried to remove a dataset, and it hung on one
snapshot. This was a test server, so I ended up recreating the pool instead of
trying to report a bug about it (hours of time saved, since the debugging
features for ZFS
On 05/16/10 06:52 AM, John Balestrini wrote:
Howdy All,
I've a bit of a strange problem here. I have a filesystem with one snapshot
that simply refuses to be destroyed. The snapshots just prior to it and just
after it were destroyed without problem. While running the zfs destroy command
on
Hi all
I've been doing a lot of testing with dedup and concluded it's not really ready
for production. If something fails, it can render the pool unuseless for hours
or maybe days, perhaps due to single-threded stuff in zfs. There is also very
little data available in the docs (though I've
Well i just wanted to let everyone know that preliminary results are good.
The livecd booted, all important things seem to be recognized. It sees all
16 gb of ram i installed and all 8 cores of my opteron 6128
The only real shocker is how loud the norco RPC-4220 fans are (i have
another machine
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Burgess wonsl...@gmail.com
Date: Saturday, May 15, 2010 8:09 pm
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Opteron 6100? Does it work with opensolaris?
To: Orvar Korvar knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Well i just wanted to let everyone
Yep. Dedup is on. A zpool list shows a 1.50x dedup ratio. I was imagining that
the large ratio was tied to that particular snapshot.
basie@/root# zpool list pool1
NAMESIZE ALLOC FREECAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT
pool1 2.72T 1.55T 1.17T57% 1.50x ONLINE -
So, it is possible to
On 05/16/10 12:40 PM, John Balestrini wrote:
Yep. Dedup is on. A zpool list shows a 1.50x dedup ratio. I was imagining that
the large ratio was tied to that particular snapshot.
basie@/root# zpool list pool1
NAMESIZE ALLOC FREECAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT
pool1 2.72T 1.55T 1.17T
The Intel SASUC8I Is a pretty good deal. around 150 dollars for 8 sas/sata
channels. This card is identical to the LSI SAS3081E-R for a lot less
money. It doesn't come with cables, but this leaves you free to buy the
type you need (in my case, i needed SFF-8087 - SFF-8087 cables, some people
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
Hi all
I've been doing a lot of testing with dedup and concluded it's not really ready
for production. If something fails, it can render the pool unuseless for hours
or maybe days, perhaps due to single-threded stuff in zfs. There is also very
little data
34 matches
Mail list logo
