Suppose I start a zpool scrub and reboot before the scrub is finished. On
reboot does the scrub carry on from where it left off or does it start at the
beginning again?
Thanks
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
If a shell script may be dependent on GNU 'cat', does that make the shell
script a derived work? Note that GNU 'cat' could be replaced with some
other 'cat' since 'cat' has a well defined interface. A very similar
situation exists for loadable
Ian Collins i...@ianshome.com wrote:
A quick test with a C++ application I'm working with which does a lot of
string and container manipulation shows it
runs about 10% slower in 64 bit mode on AMD64 and about the same in 32
or 64 bit on a core i7. Built with -fast.
This may be a result of
On 08/19/10 08:51 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Ian Collinsi...@ianshome.com wrote:
A quick test with a C++ application I'm working with which does a lot of
string and container manipulation shows it
runs about 10% slower in 64 bit mode on AMD64 and about the same in 32
or 64 bit on a core
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Linder, Doug
there are an
awful lot of places that actively DO NOT want the latest and greatest,
and for good reason.
Agreed. Latest-greatest has its place, which is not 24/7
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Peter Jeremy
My interpretation of those results is that you can't generalise: The
only way to determine whether your application is faster in 32-bit or
64-bit more is to test it. And your
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Joerg Schilling
1) The OpenSource definition
http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php
section 9 makes it very clear that an OSS license must not restrict
other
software and must not
So i've inherited this solaris 10 system with a sun storedge attached.
pool: tol-pool
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
tol-pool ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0
Edward Ned Harvey sh...@nedharvey.com wrote:
The reasons for ZFS not in Linux must be more than just the license issue.
If Linux has ZFS, then it would be possible to do
- I/O performance analysis based on the same FS implementation
- stability analysis for data, crashes, ...
Apparently, I must not be using the right web form...
I would update the case sometimes via the web, and it seems like no one
actually saw it. Or, some other engineer comes along and asks me the
same set of questions that were already answered (and recorded in the
case records!).
Another
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 21:25 +1200, Ian Collins wrote:
On 08/19/10 08:51 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Ian Collinsi...@ianshome.com wrote:
A quick test with a C++ application I'm working with which does a lot of
string and container manipulation shows
On 19 Aug 2010, at 19:42, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 21:25 +1200, Ian Collins wrote:
On 08/19/10 08:51 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Ian Collinsi...@ianshome.com wrote:
A quick test with a C++ application I'm working with which does a
lot of
string and container
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 20:14 +0100, Daniel Taylor wrote:
On 19 Aug 2010, at 19:42, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Out of interest, what language do you recommend?
Depends on the job -- I'm a huge fan of choosing the right tool for the
job. I just think C++ tries to be jack of all trades and winds up
On 08/20/10 07:13 AM, C. Bergström wrote:
(Why is this being discussed on zfs-discuss)
As a distraction form the endless circular licensing arguments?
--
Ian.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 08/20/10 07:48 AM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 20:14 +0100, Daniel Taylor wrote:
On 19 Aug 2010, at 19:42, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Out of interest, what language do you recommend?
Depends on the job -- I'm a huge fan of choosing the right tool for the
job. I just
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 20:14 +0100, Daniel Taylor wrote:
On 19 Aug 2010, at 19:42, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Out of interest, what language do you recommend?
Depends on the job -- I'm a huge fan of choosing the right tool for the
job. I just think C++ tries to be
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
There are many many things to dislike about C++ -- you *can* write good
clean code in C++, but almost none of the C++ code I've seen fits that
description.
The various side effects, and unexpected memory explosion that occurs
with the favored C++
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
That is a major concern. But the problem is also that the ABIs created
by different compilers vary. You can't mix g++ and studio generated
code, for example. That's not FUD, its technical fact.
Not today, but it's my understanding this will be possible in the
On 08/20/10 08:35 AM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 03:26 +0700, C. Bergström wrote:
Ian Collins wrote:
On 08/20/10 07:48 AM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 20:14 +0100, Daniel Taylor wrote:
On 19 Aug 2010, at 19:42, Garrett D'Amore
Garrett D'Amore garr...@nexenta.com wrote:
There is no common C++ ABI. So you get into compatibility concerns
between code built with different compilers (like Studio vs. g++).
Fail.
The interesting thing is: Sun Studio on Linux is able to interoperate with g++
Jörg
--
On 08/20/10 08:30 AM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 07:58 +1200, Ian Collins wrote:
On 08/20/10 07:48 AM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 20:14 +0100, Daniel Taylor wrote:
On 19 Aug 2010, at 19:42, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Out of interest, what
On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 09:23 +1200, Ian Collins wrote:
There is no common C++ ABI. So you get into compatibility concerns
between code built with different compilers (like Studio vs. g++).
Fail.
Which is why we have extern C. Just about any Solaris driver, library
or
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 09:23:56AM +1200, Ian Collins wrote:
On 08/20/10 08:30 AM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
There is no common C++ ABI. So you get into compatibility concerns
between code built with different compilers (like Studio vs. g++).
Fail.
Which is why we have extern C. Just about
On 08/20/10 09:26 AM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 09:23 +1200, Ian Collins wrote:
There is no common C++ ABI. So you get into compatibility concerns
between code built with different compilers (like Studio vs. g++).
Fail.
Which is why we have extern C. Just about
On 08/20/10 09:33 AM, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 09:23:56AM +1200, Ian Collins wrote:
On 08/20/10 08:30 AM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
There is no common C++ ABI. So you get into compatibility concerns
between code built with different compilers (like Studio vs.
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 09:38:51AM +1200, Ian Collins wrote:
On 08/20/10 09:33 AM, Nicolas Williams wrote:
Any driver C++ code would still need a C++ run-time. Either you must
statically link it in, or you'll have a problem with multiple drivers
using different C++ run-times. If you
On 08/20/10 09:48 AM, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 09:38:51AM +1200, Ian Collins wrote:
On 08/20/10 09:33 AM, Nicolas Williams wrote:
Any driver C++ code would still need a C++ run-time. Either you must
statically link it in, or you'll have a problem with multiple
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010, Erik Trimble wrote:
While there were certainly a few folks who ran OpenSolaris in production
(who absolutely needed the new features and couldn't wait until they made
it to Solaris 10),
Or those features that simply were never going to be backported to S10,
particularly
I got the motherboard wrong. It is a P45 Neo3-FR. The onboard ethernet is
flaky, but supported, and the USB attached drives work fine w/ 2TB drives,
but not the motherboard attached SATA ports...
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
On 8/19/10 10:48 AM +0200 Joerg Schilling wrote:
1) The OpenSource definition
http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php section 9 makes it very
clear that an OSS license must not restrict other software and must not
prevent to bundle different works under different licenses on one medium.
30 matches
Mail list logo
