From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of devsk
If dedup is ON and the pool develops a corruption in a file, I can
never fix it because when I try to copy the correct file on top of the
corrupt file,
the block hash will match with
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org
[mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of devsk
If dedup is ON and the pool develops a corruption
in a file, I can
never fix it because when I try to copy the correct
file on top of the
corrupt file,
the block hash will
You are saying ZFS will detect and rectify this kind of corruption in a
deduped pool automatically if enough redundancy is present? Can that fail
sometimes? Under what conditions?
I would hate to restore a 1.5TB pool from backup just because one 5MB file
is gone bust. And I have a known good
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of devsk
What do you mean original? dedup creates only one copy of the file
blocks. The file was not corrupt when it was copied 3 months ago.
Please describe the problem.
If you copied the
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 06:36:37PM -0400, Toby Thain wrote:
On 21-Aug-10, at 3:06 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Aug 21, 2010, at 2:14 PM, Bill Sommerfeld bill.sommerf...@oracle.com
wrote:
On 08/21/10 10:14, Ross Walker wrote:
...
Would I be better off forgoing resiliency for simplicity,
On Aug 21, 2010, at 9:22 PM, devsk wrote:
If dedup is ON and the pool develops a corruption in a file, I can never fix
it because when I try to copy the correct file on top of the corrupt file,
the block hash will match with the existing blocks and only reference count
will be updated. The
On 08/23/10 10:38 AM, Richard Elling wrote:
On Aug 21, 2010, at 9:22 PM, devsk wrote:
If dedup is ON and the pool develops a corruption in a file, I can never fix it
because when I try to copy the correct file on top of the corrupt file,
the block hash will match with the existing blocks
On Aug 21, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
On 21-Aug-10, at 3:06 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Aug 21, 2010, at 2:14 PM, Bill Sommerfeld bill.sommerf...@oracle.com
wrote:
On 08/21/10 10:14, Ross Walker wrote:
...
Would I be better off forgoing resiliency for simplicity, putting all my
On Aug 22, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 08/23/10 10:38 AM, Richard Elling wrote:
On Aug 21, 2010, at 9:22 PM, devsk wrote:
If dedup is ON and the pool develops a corruption in a file, I can never
fix it because when I try to copy the correct file on top of the corrupt
file,
On Sat, Aug 21 at 4:13, Orvar Korvar wrote:
And by the way: Wasn't there a comment of Linus Torvals recently that people shound
move their low-quality code into the codebase ??? ;)
Anyone knows the link? Good against the Linux fanboys. :o)
Can't find the original reference, but I
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Eric D. Mudama
On Sat, Aug 21 at 4:13, Orvar Korvar wrote:
And by the way: Wasn't there a comment of Linus Torvals recently that
people shound move their low-quality code into the codebase
11 matches
Mail list logo
