Phil Harman phil.har...@sun.com writes:
Gary Mills wrote:
The Solaris implementation of mmap(2) is functionally correct, but the
wait for a 64 bit address space rather moved the attention of
performance tuning elsewhere. I must admit I was surprised to see so
much code out there that still
Bryan Cantrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 02:21:11PM -0500, Ed Saipetch wrote:
Can someone clarify Sun's approach to opensourcing projects and
software? I was under the impression the strategy was to charge for
hardware, maintenance and PS. If not, some
Alex Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it fun to have autocomplete in zpool or zfs command?
For instance -
zfs cr 'Tab key' will become zfs create
zfs clone 'Tab key' will show me the available snapshots
zfs set 'Tab key' will show me the available properties, then zfs set
On 10/10/2008, at 5:12 PM, Nathan Kroenert wrote:
On 10/10/08 05:06 PM, Boyd Adamson wrote:
Alex Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it fun to have autocomplete in zpool or zfs command?
For instance -
zfs cr 'Tab key' will become zfs create
zfs clone 'Tab key' will show me
David Dyer-Bennet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, October 7, 2008 09:19, Johan Hartzenberg wrote:
Wouldn't it be great if programmers could just focus on writing code
rather than having to worry about getting sued over whether someone
else is able or not to make a derivative program from
Carson Gaspar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Carson Gaspar[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Louwtjie Burger wrote:
Dumping a large file from memory using tar to LTO yields 44 MB/s ... I
suspect the CPU cannot push more since it's a single thread doing all the
work.
Dumping
Vikas Kakkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[..]
Would you know if ZFS is supported for Sun Cluster?
ZFS is supported as a failover filesystem in SunCluster 3.2. There is no
support for ZFS as a global filesystem.
HTH,
Boyd
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
Enda O'Connor ( Sun Micro Systems Ireland) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
[..]
meant to add that on x86 the following should do the trick ( again I'm open
to correction )
installgrub /boot/grub/stage1 /zfsroot/boot/grub/stage2 /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s0
haven't tested the z86 one though.
I used
Walter Faleiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
GC Warning: Large stack limit(10485760): only scanning 8 MB
Hi,
I reinstalled our Solaris 10 box using the latest update available.
However I could not upgrade the zpool
bash-3.00# zpool upgrade -v
This system is currently running ZFS version 4.
Marcelo Leal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello all,
[..]
1) What the difference between the smb server in solaris/opensolaris,
and the new project CIFS?
What you refer to as the smb server in solaris/opensolaris is in fact
Samba, which sits on top of a plain unix system. This has
Glaser, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all, I?m new to the list and I thought I?d start out on the right
foot. ZFS is great, but I have a couple questions?.
I have a Try-n-buy x4500 with one large zfs pool with 40 1TB drives in
it. The pool is named backup.
Of this pool, I have a
A Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 05:56:44PM -0700, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
How about SPARC - can it do zfs install+root yet, or if not, when?
Just got a couple of nice 1TB SAS drives, and I think I'd prefer to
have a mirrored pool where zfs owns the entire
Richard Elling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
E. Mike Durbin wrote:
Is there a way to to a create a zfs file system
(e.g. zpool create boot /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s1)
Then, (after vacating the old boot disk) add
another
device and make the zpool a mirror?
Silvio Armando Davi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I create a pool mirrored with 1gb of space. After I create a file
system in that pool and put a file (file1) of 300MB it that file
system. After that, I create a snapshot in the file system. With the
zfs list command the space used by the
Kenny [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have Sun Solaris 5.10 Generic_120011-14 and the zpool version is 4.
I've found references to version 5-10 on the Open Solaris site.
Are these versions for Open solaris only? I've searched the SUN site
for ZFS patches and found nothing (most likely operator
Marcus Sundman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, you see, there is no way for me to use filenames intelligibly unless
their encodings are knowable. (In fact I'm quite surprised that zfs
doesn't (and even can't) know the encoding(s) of filenames. Usually Sun
seems to make relatively sane design
Nathan Kroenert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Nathan Kroenert wrote:
It does seem that some of us are getting a little caught up in disks
and their magnificence in what they write to the platter and read
back, and overlooking the potential value of a
Richard Elling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tim wrote:
The greatest hammer in the world will be inferior to a drill when
driving a screw :)
The greatest hammer in the world is a rotary hammer, and it
works quite well for driving screws or digging through degenerate
granite ;-) Need a
Uwe Dippel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any completed write needs to be CDP-ed.
And that is the rub, precisely. There is nothing in the app - kernel
interface currently that indicates that a write has completed to a state
that is meaningful to the application.
Since I spend a lot of time going from machine to machine so I thought
I'd carry a pool with me on a couple of USB keys. It all works fine
but it's slow, so I thought I'd attach a file vdev to the pool and
then offline the USB devices for speed, then undo when I want to take
the keys with
On 27/08/2007, at 12:36 AM, Rainer J.H. Brandt wrote:
Sorry, this is a bit off-topic, but anyway:
Ronald Kuehn writes:
No. You can neither access ZFS nor UFS in that way. Only one
host can mount the file system at the same time (read/write or
read-only doesn't matter here).
I can see why
Craig Cory [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The GUI is an implementation of the webmin tool. You must be running the
server - started with
Actually, I think webmin is a completely different tool.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 01/08/2007, at 7:50 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Boyd Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or alternatively, are you comparing ZFS(Fuse) on Linux with XFS on
Linux? That doesn't seem to make sense since the userspace
implementation will always suffer.
Someone has just mentioned that all of UFS
Sergey Chechelnitskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi All,
We have a problem running a scientific application dCache on ZFS.
dCache is a java based software that allows to store huge datasets in
pools. One dCache pool consists of two directories pool/data and
pool/control. The real data goes
Richard Elling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Vishal Dhuru wrote:
Hi ,
I am looking for customer shareable presentation on the ZFS vs VxFS
, Any pointers to URL or direct attached prezo is highly appreciated
!
40,000 foot level, one slide for PHBs, one slide for Dilberts :-)
-- richard
On 26/06/2007, at 12:08 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been saving up a few wishlist items for zfs. Time to share.
1. A verbose (-v) option to the zfs commandline.
In particular zfs sometimes takes a while to return from zfs
snapshot -r tank/[EMAIL PROTECTED] in the case where there are a
On 28/06/2007, at 12:29 AM, Victor Latushkin wrote:
It is not so easy to predict. ZFS will coalesce writes. A single
transaction
group may have many different writes in it. Also, raidz[12] is
dynamic, and
will use what it needs, unlike separate volume managers who do not
have any
IIRC, there is at least some of the necessary code for file change
notification present in order to support NFSv4 delegations on the server
side. Last time I looked it wasn't exposed to userspace.
On 3/21/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the file event monitor portion of
On 29/01/2007, at 12:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 28-Jan-07, at 7:59 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27-Jan-07, at 10:15 PM, Anantha N. Srirama wrote:
... ZFS will not stop alpha particle induced memory corruption
after data has been received by server and verified to be
On 18/01/2007, at 9:55 PM, Jeremy Teo wrote:
On the issue of the ability to remove a device from a zpool, how
useful/pressing is this feature? Or is this more along the line of
nice to have?
Assuming we're talking about removing a top-level vdev..
I introduce new sysadmins to ZFS on a weekly
On 12/12/2006, at 8:48 AM, Richard Elling wrote:
Jim Hranicky wrote:
By mistake, I just exported my test filesystem while it was up
and being served via NFS, causing my tar over NFS to start
throwing stale file handle errors. Should I file this as a bug, or
should I just not do that :-
On 10/10/2006, at 10:05 AM, ttoulliu2002 wrote:
Hi:
I have zpool created
# zpool list
NAMESIZEUSED AVAILCAP HEALTH
ALTROOT
ktspool34,5G 33,5K 34,5G 0% ONLINE -
However, zpool status shows no known data error. May I know what
On 05/10/2006, at 8:10 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Jeremy Teo wrote:
Hello,
request sponsor for #4890717 want append-only files.
I have a working prototype where the administrator can put a zfs fs
into append only mode by setting the zfs appendonly property to
on using zfs(1M).
append only mode
On 05/10/2006, at 11:28 AM, Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
Boyd Adamson wrote:
On 05/10/2006, at 8:10 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Jeremy Teo wrote:
Hello,
request sponsor for #4890717 want append-only files.
I have a working prototype where the administrator can put a zfs fs
into append only mode
On 13/09/2006, at 2:29 AM, Eric Schrock wrote:
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 07:23:00AM -0400, Jeff A. Earickson wrote:
Modify the dovecot IMAP server so that it can get zfs quota
information
to be able to implement the QUOTA feature of the IMAP protocol
(RFC 2087).
In this case pull the zfs
On 12/09/2006, at 1:28 AM, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 06:39:28AM -0700, Bui Minh Truong wrote:
Does ssh -v tell you any more ?
I don't think problem is ZFS send/recv. I think it's take a lot of
time to connect over SSH.
I tried to access SSH by typing: ssh remote_machine.
On 30/08/2006, at 5:17 AM, James Dickens wrote:
ZFS + rsync, backup on steroids.
I was thinking today about backing up filesystems, and came up with an
awesome idea. Use the power of rsync and ZFS together.
Start with a one or two large SATA/PATA drives if you use two and
don't need the space
On 26/08/2006, at 4:32 AM, Richard Elling - PAE wrote:
Hawk Tsai wrote:
Webmin is faster and light weight compared to SMC.
... and most people don't know it ships with Solaris. See webmin
(1m) and
webminsetup(1m).
-- richard
I suspect the real question was that in the subject, but not
On 24/08/2006, at 6:40 AM, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
However, once you upgrade to build 35 or later (including S10
6/06), do
not downgrade back to build 34 or earlier, per the following message:
Summary: If you use ZFS, do not downgrade from build 35 or later to
build 34 or
On 24/08/2006, at 10:14 AM, Arlina Goce-Capiral wrote:
Hello James,
Thanks for the response.
Yes. I got the bug id# and forwarded that to customer. But cu said
that he can create a large file
that is large as the stripe of the 3 disks. And if he pull a disk,
the whole zpool failes, so
On 08/08/2006, at 10:44 PM, Luke Scharf wrote:
The release I'm playing with (Alpha 5) does, indeed, have ZFS.
However, I can't determine what version of ZFS is included.
Dselect gives the following information, which doesn't ring any
bells for me:
*** Req base sunwzfsr
On 22/05/2006, at 6:41 AM, Ron Halstead wrote:
To expand on the original question: in nv 38 and 39, I start the
Java Web Console https://localhost:6789 and log in as root. Instead
of the available application including ZFS admin, I get this page:
You Do Not Have Access to Any Application
No
One question that has come up a number of times when I've been
speaking with people (read: evangelizing :) ) about ZFS is about
database storage. In conventional use storage has separated redo logs
from table space, on a spindle basis.
I'm not a database expert but I believe the reasons
43 matches
Mail list logo
