On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Emily Grettel
emilygrettelis...@hotmail.com wrote:
I'm wondering what other people are using, even though the Green series has
let me down, I'm still a Western Digital gal.
What do people already use on their enterprise level NAS's? Any good Seagates?
FWIW,
I don't want to run SXCE anymore. I'm trying to decide between:
EON ZFS NAS
http://eonstorage.blogspot.com/
--or--
NexentaCore Platform (v2.0 RC3)
http://www.nexenta.org/os/NexentaCore
--or--
OpenSolaris 2009.06 (when it's released)
My needs are:
* Easy package management
* Easy upgrades
*
Today, I noticed this:
[...@coruscant$] zpool status
pool: tank
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An
attempt was made to correct the error. Applications are unaffected.
action: Determine if the device needs to be replaced, and clear the
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Joe S js.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Today, I noticed this:
[...@coruscant$] zpool status
pool: tank
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An
attempt was made to correct the error. Applications are unaffected
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Kyle Kakligian kaklig...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.com
wrote:
additional comment below...
Kyle Kakligian wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Blake blake.ir...@gmail.com wrote:
that link
I appreciate the feedback.
I've decided to:
* create daily ZFS snapshots and zfs send these to separate external
disks (via esata).
* create monthly full backups via rsync, tar, or amanda on separate
external disks.
I'm not going to store everything on S3, it is too expensive. However,
I will
I have an OpenSolaris snv_105 server at home that holds my photos,
docs, music, etc, in a zfs pool. I backup my laptops with rsync to the
OpenSolaris server. All of my important data is in one place, on the
OpenSolaris server. I want to backup this data. I want to protect
against losing my data,
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 3:35 PM, David Magda dma...@ee.ryerson.ca wrote:
On Feb 17, 2009, at 17:56, Joe S wrote:
Does that sound like a viable backup solution?
It has been explicitly stated numerous times that the output of 'zfs send'
has no guarantees and it is undocumented. From zfs(1M
In the last few weeks, I've seen a number of new NAS devices released
from companies like HP, QNAP, VIA, Lacie, Buffalo, Iomega,
Cisco/Linksys, etc. Most of these are powered by Intel Celeron, Intel
Atom, AMD Sempron, Marvell Orion, or Via C7 chips. I've also noticed
that most allow a maximum of 1
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:21 PM, JZ j...@excelsioritsolutions.com wrote:
try that first, and then please ask again - will run OpenSolaris?
You don't run things on NAS boxes, you attach things to them.
These NAS devices need an OS. They come preinstalled with Windows Home
Server. I would like
Aulbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Joe,
Joe S wrote:
How do I get SMART data from my drives?
I'm running snv_101 on AMD64.
I have 6x SATA disks.
I guess that highly depends how these are connected. If they are not
'hidden' behind a RAID-controller, you might have success with
http
I did not use the Marvell nic.
I use an Intel gigabit pci nic (e1000g0).
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 2:03 PM, SV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
js.lists , or anyone else who is using a XFX MDA72P7509 Motherboard ---
that onboard NIC is a Marvell? - Do you choose not to use it in favor of the
Intel
How do I get SMART data from my drives?
I'm running snv_101 on AMD64.
I have 6x SATA disks.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
I read Ben Rockwood's blog post about Thumpers and SMART
(http://cuddletech.com/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=993). Will the SUNWhd
package only work on a Thumper? Can I use this on my snv_101 system
with AMD 64 bit processor and nVidia SATA?
___
zfs-discuss
Thanks Gary. This solved the problem. I wish I knew where to find
these reminders in advance of doing an upgrade. I hate reboots. ;-)
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Gary Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 04:09:08PM -0700, Joe S wrote:
Sorry if this is the wrong list
Sorry if this is the wrong list, but I would like to know if this is a
known problem, or if its just me.
I'm in the middle of a live upgrade on an x86 box.
I type this command:
# luupgrade -u -n snv_99 -s /mnt
~~~output~~~
System has findroot enabled GRUB
No entry for BE snv_99 in GRUB menu
You may need an add-on SATA card. I haven't come across any 8 port motherboards.
As far as chipsets are concerned, take a look at something with the
Intel X38 chipset. It's the only one of the desktop chipsets that
supports ECC ram. Coincidentally, it's also the chipset used in the
Sun Ultra 24
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Todd H. Poole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't agree with you more. I'm beginning to understand what the phrase
Sun's software is great - as long as you're running it on Sun's hardware
means...
Whether it's deserved or not, I feel like this OS isn't mature
disk connectedconfigured ok
sata0/4::dsk/c2t4d0disk connectedconfigured ok
sata0/5::dsk/c2t5d0disk connectedconfigured ok
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Joe S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I wanted the Intel Core
While I wanted the Intel Core 2 Duo confuration, it was too much
money. Even when I substituted the processor for a low power wolfdale,
the E7200. The Intel option cost $126 more than the AMD/GeForce
option. I was up to $457.88 with shipping and tax.
Also, in some power benchmarks, the AMD 4850e
I'm want to upgrade the hardware of my Open Solaris b95 server at
home. It's currently running on 32 bit intel hardware. I'm going 64
bit with the new hardware. I don't need server grade hardware since
this is a home server. This means I'm not buying the an Opteron or
Xeon, or any quad core
I got overzealous with snapshot creation. Every 5 mins is a bad idea.
Way too many.
What's the easiest way to delete the empty ones?
zfs list takes FOREVER
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi,
is there a way to use ZFS Encryption with OpenSolaris/Indiana? I've searching
for a roadmap, where will it be integrated first (opensolaris, solaris CE
etc)...
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
Has anyone here attempted to store their MS Exchange data store on a
ZFS pool? If so, could you please tell me about your setup? A friend
is looking for a NAS solution, and may be interested in a ZFS box
instead of a netapp or something like that.
Thanks.
After researching this further, I found that there are some known
performance issues with NFS + ZFS. I tried transferring files via SMB, and
got write speeds on average of 25MB/s.
So I will have my UNIX systems use SMB to write files to my Solaris server.
This seems weird, but its fast. I'm sure
I had the same question last week decided to take a similar approach.
Instead of a giant raidz of 6 disks, i created 2 raidz's of 3 disks each. So
when I want to add more storage, I just add 3 more disks.
On 6/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Huitzi,
Yes, you are correct.
I have a couple of performance questions.
Right now, I am transferring about 200GB of data via NFS to my new Solaris
server. I started this YESTERDAY. When writing to my ZFS pool via NFS, I
notice what I believe to be slow write speeds. My client hosts vary between
a MacBook Pro running Tiger to
Correction:
SATA Controller is a Sillcon Image 3114, not a 3112.
On 6/19/07, Joe S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a couple of performance questions.
Right now, I am transferring about 200GB of data via NFS to my new Solaris
server. I started this YESTERDAY. When writing to my ZFS pool via
in a pool? That would be like RAID 5-0 right? Any
disadvantage to doing this? It looks like I'll get the read performance of 2
disks.
-joe
On 6/17/07, Joe S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm playing around with ZFS and want to figure out the best use of my 6x
300GB SATA drives. The purpose
I'm playing around with ZFS and want to figure out the best use of my 6x
300GB SATA drives. The purpose of the drives is to store all of my data at
home (video, photos, music, etc). I'm debating between:
6x 300GB disks in a single raidz2 pool
--or--
2x (3x 300GB disks in a pool) mirrored
like I'm not
understanding raidz.
On 6/17/07, Marc Bevand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe S js.lists at gmail.com writes:
I'm going to create 3x 2-way mirrors. I guess I don't really *need* the
raidz at this point. My biggest concern with raidz is getting locked
into
a configuration i can't
.
On 6/17/07, Richard Elling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe S wrote:
I'm playing around with ZFS and want to figure out the best use of my 6x
300GB SATA drives. The purpose of the drives is to store all of my data
at home (video, photos, music, etc). I'm debating between:
6x 300GB disks in a single
this whole thread.
On 6/17/07, Joe S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, so you are the Richard behind those articles I've been mulling over!
:-)
You blog posts helped me to realize there was much more forethought
required when setting up my ZFS pool(s).
I'm glad I'm not the only person
33 matches
Mail list logo
