On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 01:20:54AM -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
So cutting to the chase here... would you happen to have a
recommendation from your own experience, or something you've heard
will work and that can stand more ram... my current setup tops out at
3gb.
The link to the HCL that was
Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us writes:
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Miles Nordin wrote:
I would like 64-bit hardware with ECC, 8GB RAM, and a good Ethernet
chip, that can run both Linux and Solaris. I do not plan to use the
onboard SATA. So far I'm having nasty problems with an nForce
hp == Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes:
hp I'm thinking of turning to Asus again and making sure there is
hp onboard SATA with at least 4 prts and preferebly 6.
I would like 64-bit hardware with ECC, 8GB RAM, and a good Ethernet
chip, that can run both Linux and Solaris. I do not
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Miles Nordin wrote:
I would like 64-bit hardware with ECC, 8GB RAM, and a good Ethernet
chip, that can run both Linux and Solaris. I do not plan to use the
onboard SATA. So far I'm having nasty problems with an nForce 750a
board from asus (M3N72-D) under Linux.
Did you
Check out http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/data/os
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 28, 2009, at 2:20 AM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
Brian Hechinger wo...@4amlunch.net writes:
[...]
I think it would be better to answer this question that it would to
attempt to answer the VirtualBox
Brian Hechinger wo...@4amlunch.net writes:
[...]
I think it would be better to answer this question that it would to
attempt to answer the VirtualBox question (I run it on a 64-bit OS,
so I can't really answer that anyway).
Thanks yes and appreciated here
The benefit to running ZFS on a
Marco Lopes marco.lo...@sun.com writes:
Correct, VirtualBox 2.1 and above will allow a 64 bit VM on top of a
32 bit host OS, but it requires a CPU with AMD-V or VT-x support.
Without the CPU virtualization extensions Virtualbox will only allow a
32 bit VM on a 32 bit host OS.
For the
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 07:14:14PM -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
My whole purpose is to experiment with zfs... would I see much
difference if opensol was installed 64 bit as compared to 32 bit?
I noticed the Simon blogs that describe how to setup a home zfs server
(
The changelog says 64-bit guest on 32-bit host support was added in 2.1:
http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Changelog
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Brian Hechinger wo...@4amlunch.net wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 07:14:14PM -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
My whole purpose is to experiment with
Correct, VirtualBox 2.1 and above will allow a 64 bit VM on top of a 32
bit host OS, but it requires a CPU with AMD-V or VT-x support. Without
the CPU virtualization extensions Virtualbox will only allow a 32 bit VM
on a 32 bit host OS.
For the Athlon64 chip AMD-V will only be present for
I've seen some talk on vmware forums indicating it is possible to run
64 bit guests on a 32 bit host as long as something called VT
technology is available.
I have an athlon64 +3200 running 32 bit WinXP pro. I wondered if I
would be able to run opensol in 64 bit as guest inside VirtualBox?
I
Then you would be looking for AMD-V extensions. VT is only for Intel chips.
I highly doubt a 3200+ has the AMD-V extensions.
--Tim
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
I've seen some talk on vmware forums indicating it is possible to run
64 bit guests on
Hi Harry,
I doubt it too. Try here to be sure (no need to install, unzip in a folder
and just run).
CPUID http://www.cpuid.com/
Check the processor features when you run the app. I hope that helps.
/Mark :-)
2009/2/26 Tim t...@tcsac.net
Then you would be looking for AMD-V extensions. VT
Mark mark.hom...@gmail.com writes:
I doubt it too. Try here to be sure (no need to install, unzip in a folder
and just run).
CPUID http://www.cpuid.com/
Check the processor features when you run the app. I hope that helps.
That is a nice little tool. Thanks
14 matches
Mail list logo
