Re: [zfs-discuss] Major problem with a new ZFS setup

2007-11-09 Thread Victor Engle
Are all 24 disks in one big raidz raid set with no spares assigned to the pool? If so then maybe the host is having trouble operating on parity over that many drives when the "experienced an unrecoverable error" errors occur. From what I've read it might be better to create the pool with 3 raidz se

Re: [zfs-discuss] Major problem with a new ZFS setup

2007-11-08 Thread Michael Stalnaker
We weren't able to do anything at all, and finally rebooted the system. When we did, everything came back normally, even with the target that was reporting errors before. We're using an LSI PCI-E controller that's on the supported device list, and LSI 3801-E. Right now, I'm trying to figure out if

Re: [zfs-discuss] Major problem with a new ZFS setup

2007-11-08 Thread Ian Collins
Michael Stalnaker wrote: > > Finally trying to do a zpool status yields: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# zpool status -v > pool: LogData > state: ONLINE > status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An > attempt was made to correct the error. Applications are unaffecte

[zfs-discuss] Major problem with a new ZFS setup

2007-11-08 Thread Michael Stalnaker
We recently installed a 24 disk SATA array with an LSI controller attached to a box running Solaris X86 10 Release 4. The drives were set up in one big pool with raidz, and it worked great for about a month. On the 4th, we had the system kernel panic and crash, and it's now behaving very badly. He