this is on linux with zfs-fuse (since no other zfs implementation besides
zfs-fuse has support for lzo at this time)
btw - here is some additional comparison - now with some real-world data.
copying over some mysql database dir (var/lib/mysql) of size 231M gives:
lzo | 0m41.152s | 2.31x
lzjb
Those are interesting results.
yes, indeed
Does this mean you've already written lzo support into ZFS?
no, i`m not a real coder, but there exists an lzo patch for zfs-fuse which
has also been discussed here, afaik.
not sure if this has already been included in zfs-fuse tree - just wanted to
last number (2.99x) is compression ratio and was much better than lzjb.
not sure if there is some mistake here, i was quite surprised that it was so
much better than lzjb
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
