[zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS and UFS performance

2007-03-29 Thread prasad
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, prasad wrote: We create iso images of our product in the following way (high-level): # mkfile 3g /isoimages/myiso # lofiadm -a /isoimages/myiso /dev/lofi/1 # newfs /dev/rlofi/1 # mount /dev/lofi/1 /mnt # cd /mnt; zcat /product/myproduct.tar.Z | tar xf -

[zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS and UFS performance

2007-03-28 Thread Jürgen Keil
We are running Solaris 10 11/06 on a Sun V240 with 2 CPUS and 8 GB of memory. This V240 is attached to a 3510 FC that has 12 x 300 GB disks. The 3510 is configured as HW RAID 5 with 10 disks and 2 spares and it's exported to the V240 as a single LUN. We create iso images of our product in

[zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS and UFS performance

2007-03-28 Thread prasad
That's probably bug 6382683 lofi is confused about sync/async I/O, and AFAIK it's fixed in current opensolaris releases. See the thread with subject bad lofi performance with zfs file backend / bad mmap write performance from january / february 2006:

[zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS and UFS performance

2007-03-28 Thread Anton B. Rang
According to Bug Database bug 6382683 is in 1-Dispatched state, what does that mean? Roughly speaking, the bug has been entered into the database, but no developer has been assigned to it. (State 3 indicates that a developer or team has agreed that it's a bug; it sounds likely that this bug