Re: [zfs-discuss] Recommended setup?

2007-03-17 Thread Dick Davies
Just saw a message on xen-discuss that HVM is in the next version (b60-ish). On 15/03/07, Dick Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't Solaris dom0 does Pacifica (amd-v) yet. That would rule out windows for now. You can run centOS zones on SXCR. That just leaves freebsd (which hasn't got

Re: [zfs-discuss] Recommended setup?

2007-03-15 Thread Dick Davies
I don't Solaris dom0 does Pacifica (amd-v) yet. That would rule out windows for now. You can run centOS zones on SXCR. That just leaves freebsd (which hasn't got fantastic xen support either, despite Kip Macys excellent work). Unless you've got an app that needs that, zones sound like a much

[zfs-discuss] Recommended setup?

2007-03-13 Thread Malachi de Ælfweald
A little background... Awhile back, a FreeBSD server (running 7 domains) I had running for 3 years (without reboot) got hacked into over Christmas break. They wiped everything, including most of the logs. I was able to determine that they got in from one of the user accounts. As you could

Re: [zfs-discuss] Recommended setup?

2007-03-13 Thread Alexander Kolbasov
A little background... Awhile back, a FreeBSD server (running 7 domains) I had running for 3 years (without reboot) got hacked into over Christmas break. They wiped everything, including most of the logs. I was able to determine that they got in from one of the user accounts. As you could

Re: [zfs-discuss] Recommended setup?

2007-03-13 Thread Malachi de Ælfweald
I had thought about it, but from what I understand that limits the other VMs to Solaris. I have a few different administrators that are going to be running their own OSes (freebsd, linux, possibly windows), as well as some development ones (like jnode). From what I was able to find, that means