Re: [zfs-discuss] Suggestions about current ZFS setup

2010-04-14 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
On Tue, April 13, 2010 09:48, Christian Molson wrote: Now I would like to add my 4 x 2TB drives, I get a warning message saying that: Pool uses 5-way raidz and new vdev uses 4-way raidz Do you think it would be safe to use the -f switch here? Yes. 4-way on the bigger drive is *more*

Re: [zfs-discuss] Suggestions about current ZFS setup

2010-04-14 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
On Tue, April 13, 2010 10:38, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Tue, 13 Apr 2010, Christian Molson wrote: Now I would like to add my 4 x 2TB drives, I get a warning message saying that: Pool uses 5-way raidz and new vdev uses 4-way raidz Do you think it would be safe to use the -f switch here? It

Re: [zfs-discuss] Suggestions about current ZFS setup

2010-04-14 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, David Dyer-Bennet wrote: It should be safe but chances are that your new 2TB disks are considerably slower than the 1TB disks you already have. This should be as much cause for concern (or more so) than the difference in raidz topology. Not necessarily for a home server.

Re: [zfs-discuss] Suggestions about current ZFS setup

2010-04-14 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
On Wed, April 14, 2010 12:06, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, David Dyer-Bennet wrote: It should be safe but chances are that your new 2TB disks are considerably slower than the 1TB disks you already have. This should be as much cause for concern (or more so) than the difference

Re: [zfs-discuss] Suggestions about current ZFS setup

2010-04-14 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, David Dyer-Bennet wrote: Not necessarily for a home server. While mine so far is all mirrored pairs of 400GB disks, I don't even think about performance issues, I never come anywhere near the limits of the hardware. I don't see how the location of the server has any

Re: [zfs-discuss] Suggestions about current ZFS setup

2010-04-14 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
On Wed, April 14, 2010 12:29, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, David Dyer-Bennet wrote: Not necessarily for a home server. While mine so far is all mirrored pairs of 400GB disks, I don't even think about performance issues, I never come anywhere near the limits of the hardware.

Re: [zfs-discuss] Suggestions about current ZFS setup

2010-04-14 Thread Christian Molson
First I want to thank everyone for their input, It is greatly appreciated. To answer a few questions: Chassis I have: http://www.supermicro.com/products/chassis/4U/846/SC846E2-R900.cfm Motherboard: http://www.tyan.com/product_board_detail.aspx?pid=560 RAM: 24 GB (12 x 2GB) 10 x 1TB Seagates

Re: [zfs-discuss] Suggestions about current ZFS setup

2010-04-14 Thread Christian Molson
Just a quick update, Tested using bonnie++ just during its Intelligent write: my 5 vdevs of 4x1tb drives wrote around 300-350MB/sec using that test. The 1vdev of 4x2TB drives wrote more inconsistently, between 200-300. This is not a complete test... just looking at iostat output while bonnie++

Re: [zfs-discuss] Suggestions about current ZFS setup

2010-04-14 Thread Bill Sommerfeld
On 04/14/10 12:37, Christian Molson wrote: First I want to thank everyone for their input, It is greatly appreciated. To answer a few questions: Chassis I have: http://www.supermicro.com/products/chassis/4U/846/SC846E2-R900.cfm Motherboard:

[zfs-discuss] Suggestions about current ZFS setup

2010-04-13 Thread Christian Molson
Hi, (Main questions at bottom of post) I recently discovered the joys of ZFS. I have a home file server for backups+media, also hosting some virtual machine (over LAN). I was wondering if I could get some feedback as to whether I have set things up properly. Drives: 20 x 1TB (Mix of seagate

Re: [zfs-discuss] Suggestions about current ZFS setup

2010-04-13 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010, Christian Molson wrote: Now I would like to add my 4 x 2TB drives, I get a warning message saying that: Pool uses 5-way raidz and new vdev uses 4-way raidz Do you think it would be safe to use the -f switch here? It should be safe but chances are that your new 2TB disks