Re: [zfs-discuss] X4500 ILOM thinks disk 20 is faulted, ZFS thinks not.

2007-12-04 Thread Ralf Ramge
Jason J. W. Williams wrote: Have any of y'all seen a condition where the ILOM considers a disk faulted (status is 3 instead of 1), but ZFS keeps writing to the disk and doesn't report any errors? I'm going to do a scrub tomorrow and see what comes back. I'm curious what caused the ILOM to

[zfs-discuss] X4500 ILOM thinks disk 20 is faulted, ZFS thinks not.

2007-12-04 Thread Jason J. W. Williams
Hey Guys, Have any of y'all seen a condition where the ILOM considers a disk faulted (status is 3 instead of 1), but ZFS keeps writing to the disk and doesn't report any errors? I'm going to do a scrub tomorrow and see what comes back. I'm curious what caused the ILOM to fault the disk. Any

Re: [zfs-discuss] X4500 ILOM thinks disk 20 is faulted, ZFS thinks not.

2007-12-04 Thread Jason J. W. Williams
Hi Ralf, Thank you for the suggestion. About half of the disks are reporting 1968-1969 in the Soft Errors field. All disks are reporting 1968 in the Illegal Request field. There don't appear to be any other errors; all other counters are 0. The Illegal Request count seems a little fishy...like