I can't see *any* part of 6560174 on bugs.opensolaris.org, which is somewhat
annoying as it was me that filed it.
Fow what it's worth though, ZFS on firewire seems to function reasonably well
in spite of the transport reject errors I mention in that bug report.
Pete.
Jeff Thompson wrote:
Pete Bentley wrote:
I can't see *any* part of 6560174 on bugs.opensolaris.org, which is
somewhat annoying as it was me that filed it.
Does anybody else know why bug reports are disappearing on bugs.opensolaris.org?
Fow what it's worth though, ZFS on firewire seems to function reasonably
On 5 Jul 2007, at 20:33, Jeff Thompson wrote:
Pete Bentley wrote:
I can't see *any* part of 6560174 on bugs.opensolaris.org, which
is somewhat annoying as it was me that filed it.
Does anybody else know why bug reports are disappearing on
bugs.opensolaris.org?
According to a helpful
I still haven't got any warm and fuzzy responses yet solidifying ZFS
in combination with Firewire or USB enclosures.
I am looking for 4-10 drive enclosures for quiet SOHO desktop-ish use.
I am trying to confirm that OpenSolaris+ZFS would be stable with this,
if exported out as JBOD and allow ZFS
Mike,
Take a look at
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8100808442979626078q=CSI%3Amunich
Granted, this was for demo purposes, but the team in Munich is clearly
leveraging USB sticks for their purposes.
HTH,
Bev.
mike wrote:
I still haven't got any warm and fuzzy responses yet
Would you consider a USB stick to be the same usability model as a
handful of 750GB drives (backing up large files for home backup needs
- DVD backups, home pictures, etc) - that wouldn't be hot plugged
often if at all (only on failure, or accidental power loss/etc)
On 3/20/07, Bev Crair
It looks like the following bug is still open:
6424510 usb ignores DKIOCFLUSHWRITECACHE
Until it is fixed, I wouldn't even consider using ZFS on USB storage.
Even so, not all bridge boards (Firewire included) implement this
command. Unless you can verify that it functions correctly, it is
Begin forwarded message:
From: Chris Csanady [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: March 20, 2007 11:58:24 AM PDT
To: mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ZFS Discussions zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and Firewire/USB enclosures
It looks like the following bug is still open:
6424510
okay so since this is fixed, Chris, would you consider using USB/FW now?
I am desperate to replace a server that is failing and I want to
replace it with a proper quiet ZFS-based solution, I hate being held
captive by NTFS issues (it may have corrupted my data now a second
time)
ZFS's
On March 20, 2007 1:41:53 PM -0700 mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am desperate to replace a server that is failing and I want to
replace it with a proper quiet ZFS-based solution
Slightly off your point, but I can't imagine 4 drives being anything
near quiet.
-frank
Mike,
We have used 4 disks (2X80GB disks and 2X250GB disks) on USB and things
worked well.
Hot plugging the disks was not all that smooth for us.
Other than that we had no issues using the disks. We used this setup for
demos at the FOSS 2007 conference
at Bangalore and that went through
Would the system be able to halt if something was unplugged/some
massive failure happened?
That way if something got tripped, I could fix it before any
corruption or issue occured.
That would be my safety net, I suppose.
On 3/20/07, Sanjeev Bagewadi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike,
We have
12 matches
Mail list logo
