On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 09:02:43PM -0800, Tim Cook wrote:
what firmware revision are you at?
Revision: 415G
Regards
przemol
--
http://przemol.blogspot.com/
--
A co by bylo, gdybys to TY rzadzil?
Kliknij
On Dec 5, 2007, at 8:38 PM, Anton B. Rang wrote:
This might have been affected by the cache flush issue -- if the
3310 flushes its NVRAM cache to disk on SYNCHRONIZE CACHE commands,
then ZFS is penalizing itself. I don't know whether the 3310
firmware has been updated to support the
This might have been affected by the cache flush issue -- if the 3310 flushes
its NVRAM cache to disk on SYNCHRONIZE CACHE commands, then ZFS is penalizing
itself. I don't know whether the 3310 firmware has been updated to support the
SYNC_NV bit. It wasn't obvious on Sun's site where to
And some results (for OLTP workload):
http://przemol.blogspot.com/2007/08/zfs-vs-vxfs-vs-ufs
-on-scsi-array.html
While I was initially hardly surprised that ZFS offered only 11% - 15% of the
throughput of UFS or VxFS, a quick glance at Filebench's OLTP workload seems to
indicate that it's
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 02:05:13PM -0800, Brendan Gregg - Sun Microsystems
wrote:
I'd recommend running filebench for filesystem benchmarks, and see what
the results are:
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/FileBench
Filebench is able to purge the ZFS cache
In addition to Brendan's advice about benchmarking, it would be a good idea to
use the newer Solaris release (Solaris 10 08/07), which has a lot of ZFS
improvements (performance and functional).
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
HI,
The question is a ZFS performance question in reguards to SAN traffic.
We are trying to benchmark ZFS vx VxFS file systems and I get the following
performance results.
Test Setup:
Solaris 10: 11/06
Dual port Qlogic HBA with SFCSM (for ZFS) and DMP (of VxFS)
Sun Fire v490 server
LSI Raid
The 250KB below was confusing to one reader.
What I mean is that over the interval of the file write, it transfers 250KB of
traffic. man iostat and you can see that it is correct.
250KB per second is not the bandwidth.
I also understand the 'mkfile' is not an acceptable perrformance
G'Day Luke,
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 08:18:09AM -0800, Luke Schwab wrote:
HI,
The question is a ZFS performance question in reguards to SAN traffic.
We are trying to benchmark ZFS vx VxFS file systems and I get the following
performance results.
Test Setup:
Solaris 10: 11/06
Dual
