On 18/09/2009, at 1:08 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
There was a post from Ricardo on zfs-fuse list some time ago.
Apparently if you do a "zpool create" on whole disks, Linux on
Solaris behaves differently:
- solaris will create EFI partition on that disk, and use the
partition as vdev
- Linux
Tomorrow, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
There was a post from Ricardo on zfs-fuse list some time ago.
Apparently if you do a "zpool create" on whole disks, Linux on
Solaris behaves differently:
- solaris will create EFI partition on that disk, and use the partition as vdev
- Linux will use the whole
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Paul Archer wrote:
> I did a little research and found that parted on Linux handles EFI
> labelling. I used it to change the partition scheme on sda, creating an
> sda1. I then offlined sda and replaced it with sda1. I wish I had just tried
> a scrub instead of the
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Paul Archer wrote:
r...@ubuntu:~# fdisk -l /dev/sda
Disk /dev/sda: 1500.3 GB, 1500301910016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 182401 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Disk identifier: 0xce13f90b
Device Boot Start End Blocks
7:37pm, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Paul Archer wrote:
r...@ubuntu:~# fdisk -l /dev/sda
Disk /dev/sda: 1500.3 GB, 1500301910016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 182401 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Disk identifier: 0xce13f90b
Device Boot Start End
Paul Archer wrote:
r...@ubuntu:~# fdisk -l /dev/sda
Disk /dev/sda: 1500.3 GB, 1500301910016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 182401 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Disk identifier: 0xce13f90b
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1
6:44pm, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Paul Archer wrote:
What kind of partition table is on the disks, is it EFI ? If not that
might be part of the issue.
I don't believe there is any partition table on the disks. I pointed zfs to
the raw disks when I setup the pool.
If you run fdisk on OpenSola
Paul Archer wrote:
What kind of partition table is on the disks, is it EFI ? If not that
might be part of the issue.
I don't believe there is any partition table on the disks. I pointed zfs
to the raw disks when I setup the pool.
If you run fdisk on OpenSolaris against this disk what does i
5:08pm, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Paul Archer wrote:
10:09pm, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Paul Archer wrote:
I can reboot into Linux and import the pools, but haven't figured out why
I
can't import them in Solaris. I don't know if it makes a difference (I
wouldn't
10:40am, Paul Archer wrote:
I can reboot into Linux and import the pools, but haven't figured out why
I
can't import them in Solaris. I don't know if it makes a difference (I
wouldn't think so), but zfs-fuse under Linux is using ZFS version 13,
where
Nexenta is using version 14.
Just a gues
Paul Archer wrote:
10:09pm, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Paul Archer wrote:
I can reboot into Linux and import the pools, but haven't figured out
why I
can't import them in Solaris. I don't know if it makes a difference (I
wouldn't think so), but zfs-fuse under Li
10:09pm, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Paul Archer wrote:
I can reboot into Linux and import the pools, but haven't figured out why I
can't import them in Solaris. I don't know if it makes a difference (I
wouldn't think so), but zfs-fuse under Linux is using ZFS vers
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Paul Archer wrote:
> I can reboot into Linux and import the pools, but haven't figured out why I
> can't import them in Solaris. I don't know if it makes a difference (I
> wouldn't think so), but zfs-fuse under Linux is using ZFS version 13, where
> Nexenta is usin
I recently (re)built a fileserver at home, using Ubuntu and zfs-fuse to
create a ZFS filesystem (RAIDz1) on five 1.5TB drives.
I had some serious issues with NFS not working properly (kept getting
stale file handles), so I tried to switch to OpenSolaris/Nexenta, but my
SATA controller wasn't s
14 matches
Mail list logo
