Hi all,
I recently started seeing zfs chattiness at boot time: reading zfs config
and something like mounting zfs filesystems (n/n).
Is this really necessary? I thought with SMF the times where every script
announced its' existance had gone (and good thing, too).
Can't we print something only
On 9/24/07, Michael Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently started seeing zfs chattiness at boot time: reading zfs config
and something like mounting zfs filesystems (n/n).
Is this really necessary? I thought with SMF the times where every script
announced its' existance had gone (and
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Michael Schuster wrote:
I recently started seeing zfs chattiness at boot time: reading zfs config
and something like mounting zfs filesystems (n/n).
This was added recently because ZFS can take a while to mount large
configs. Consoles would appear to freeze after the
See http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=122606
-- richard
Michael Schuster wrote:
Hi all,
I recently started seeing zfs chattiness at boot time: reading zfs config
and something like mounting zfs filesystems (n/n).
Is this really necessary? I thought with SMF the
Mark J Musante wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Michael Schuster wrote:
I recently started seeing zfs chattiness at boot time: reading zfs config
and something like mounting zfs filesystems (n/n).
This was added recently because ZFS can take a while to mount large
configs. Consoles would
Paul Kraus writes:
On 9/24/07, Michael Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently started seeing zfs chattiness at boot time: reading zfs config
and something like mounting zfs filesystems (n/n).
Is this really necessary? I thought with SMF the times where every script
announced
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 12:33:00PM -0400, Mark J Musante wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Michael Schuster wrote:
I recently started seeing zfs chattiness at boot time: reading zfs config
and something like mounting zfs filesystems (n/n).
This was added recently because ZFS can take a while to
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Michael Schuster wrote:
I'm also quite prepared to see a running tally(?) after an initial timeout
(your minute) has gone by and we haven't finished ... but I guess we'd also
have to make sure that the output generated isn't messed up by other output
to the console that's
