On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Michael Johnson
mjjohnson@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm planning on running FreeBSD in VirtualBox (with a Linux host) and giving
it raw disk access to four drives, which I plan to configure as a raidz2
volume.
On top of that, I'm considering using encryption. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 09/07/2010 01:37, Edward Ned Harvey a écrit :
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Philippe Schwarz
.
But if you're impressed with performance by enabling writeback, you can
still
On 7/11/2010 3:21 AM, Philippe Schwarz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
i bought a little SSD (OCZ Agility 30GB) and added half to L2ARC and
second half to ZIL:
zpool add zfsda1 log da3s2
zpool add zfsda1 cache da3s1
zpool status
pool: zfsda1
state: ONLINE
I'm planning on running FreeBSD in VirtualBox (with a Linux host) and giving it
raw disk access to four drives, which I plan to configure as a raidz2 volume.
Wouldn't it be better or just as good to use fuse-zfs for such a configuration?
I/O from VirtualBox isn't really very good, but
On Jul 10, 2010, at 14:20, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
A few companies have already backed out of zfs
as they cannot afford to go through a lawsuit.
Or, in the case of Apple, who could definitely afford a lawsuit, but
choose
to avoid it anyway.
This was covered already:
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010, Philippe Schwarz wrote:
But, at the end of the copy process (copy a 1GB file from to the same
pool), the used capacity of the ZIL remains unchanged... Puzzling..
- - And ,last but not least... the copy isn't faster at all!
Note that the slog device is only used for
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 4:21 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk r...@karlsbakk.net
wrote:
I'm planning on running FreeBSD in VirtualBox (with a Linux host) and giving
it raw disk access to four drives, which I plan to configure as a raidz2
volume.
Wouldn't it be better or just as good to use fuse-zfs
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Edward Ned Harvey
solar...@nedharvey.comwrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Peter Taps
A few companies have already backed out of zfs
as they cannot afford to go through a lawsuit.
On Jul 11, 2010, at 5:11 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
ZFS-FUSE is horribly unstable, although that's more an indication of
the stability of the storage stack on Linux.
Not really, more an indication of the pseudo-VFS layer implemented in fuse.
Remember fuse provides it's own VFS
on 11/07/2010 15:54 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 11/07/2010 14:21 Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk said the following:
I'm planning on running FreeBSD in VirtualBox (with a Linux host)
and giving it raw disk access to four drives, which I plan to
configure as a raidz2 volume.
10 matches
Mail list logo
