That's precisely what I'm experiencing. System still responds to ping.
Anything that was already running in memory via network stays alive (cron
jobs continue to run) but remote access is impossible (ssh, vnc, even local
physical console...) And eventually the system will stop completely.
You are asking for a world of hurt. You may luck out, and it may work
great, thus saving you money. Take my example for example ... I took the
safe approach (as far as any non-sun hardware is concerned.) I bought an
officially supported dell server, with all dell blessed and solaris
On 10/25/10 08:39 PM, Markus Kovero wrote:
You are asking for a world of hurt. You may luck out, and it may work
great, thus saving you money. Take my example for example ... I took the
safe approach (as far as any non-sun hardware is concerned.) I bought an
officially supported dell server,
28.09.2010 10:45, Brandon High wrote:
Anyone had any look getting either OpenSolaris or FreeBSD with
zfs working on
I looked at it some, and all the hardware should be supported. There
is a half-height PCIe x16 and a x1 slot as well.
Somebody has already bought this microserver? :)
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 05:54:09PM +0600, Yuri Vorobyev wrote:
28.09.2010 10:45, Brandon High wrote:
Anyone had any look getting either OpenSolaris or FreeBSD with
zfs working on
I looked at it some, and all the hardware should be supported. There
is a half-height PCIe x16 and a x1 slot as
From: Markus Kovero [mailto:markus.kov...@nebula.fi]
Any other feasible alternatives for Dell hardware? Wondering, are these
issues mostly related to Nehalem-architectural problems, eg. c-states.
So is there anything good in switching hw vendor? HP anyone?
In googling around etc ... Many
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Ian Collins
Sun hardware? Then you get all your support from one vendor.
+1
Sun hardware costs more, but it's worth it, if you want to simply assume
your stuff will work. In my case, I'd
I have a zpool that once it hit 96% full the performance degraded horribly.
So, in order to get things better I'm trying to clear out some space. The
problem I have is after I've deleted a directory it no longer shows on the
filesystem level (ls) but the free space isn't cleared up. After a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/25/2010 3:39 AM, Markus Kovero wrote:
Any other feasible alternatives for Dell hardware? Wondering, are these
issues mostly related to Nehalem-architectural problems, eg. c-states.
So is there anything good in switching hw vendor? HP
So when I built my new workstation last year, I partitioned the one and only
disk in half, 50% for Windows, 50% for 2009.06. Now, I'm not using Windows,
so I'd like to use the other half for another ZFS pool, but I can't figure out
how to access it.
I have used fdisk to create a second
Oh, a few items to highlight.
There are no snapshots - never have been on this volume.
It's not just this directory in the example - it's any directory or file. The
system was running fine up until it hit 96%. Also, a full scrub of the file
system was done (took nearly two days).
--
This
Change the new partition type to something than none of the OS's on the
system will know anything about, so they don't make any invalid
assumptions about what might be in it. Then use the appropriate
partition device node, /dev/dsk/c7t0d0p4 (assuming it's the 4th primary
FDISK partition).
It looks like permissions don't descend properly from the top-level share
in CIFS; I had to set them on the next level down to get the intended
results (including on lower levels; they seem to inherit properly from the
second level, just not from the top). Is this a known behavior, or am I
In message 1026474698.131288014974214.javamail.tweb...@sf-app1, Bill Werner w
rites:
So when I built my new workstation last year, I partitioned the one and only d
isk in half, 50% for Windows, 50% for 2009.06. Now, I'm not using Windows, s
o I'd like to use the other half for another ZFS pool,
On Mon, October 25, 2010 08:38, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Ian Collins
Sun hardware? Then you get all your support from one vendor.
+1
Sun hardware costs more, but it's worth it, if you want
Hi Jim - cross-posting to zfs-discuss, because 20X is, to say the least,
compelling.
Obviously, it would be awesome if we had the opportunity to whittle-down which
of
the changes made this fly, or if it was a combination of the changes.
Looking at them individually
set
I created a new BE for patching, I applied patches to that BE, I then activated
the new BE, this is the message I got:
**
The target boot environment has been activated. It will be used when you
reboot. NOTE: You MUST NOT USE
Try install-disc...@opensolaris.org as this is more of a liveupgrade
issue than a zfs issue.
Lori
On 10/25/10 10:20 AM, Kartik Vashishta wrote:
I created a new BE for patching, I applied patches to that BE, I then activated
the new BE, this is the message I got:
Hi Frank,
You can't simulate the aclmode-less world in the upcoming release
by setting aclmode to discard in b134.
The reason you see your aclmode discarded because aclmode applies
to both chmod operations and file/dir create operations.
This is why you are seeing the ACL being discarded. It
re == Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.com writes:
re it seems the hypervisors try to do crazy things like make the
re disks readonly,
haha!
re which is perhaps the worst thing you can do to a guest OS
re because now it needs to be rebooted
I might've set it up to ``pause''
On 10/26/10 01:38 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Ian Collins
Sun hardware? Then you get all your support from one vendor.
+1
Sun hardware costs more, but it's worth it, if you want to
Am 25.10.10 21:06, schrieb Ian Collins:
On 10/26/10 01:38 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Ian Collins
Sun hardware? Then you get all your support from one vendor.
+1
Sun hardware costs more,
Hello,
Does anyone here have experience or thoughts regarding the use of ZFS on thin
devices?
Since ZFS is COW it will not play nicly with this feature, it will spread it's
blocks all over the space it has been given, and it has curently no way to get
back in contact with the storage arrays
On 10/25/10 07:23 AM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
It looks like permissions don't descend properly from the top-level share
in CIFS; I had to set them on the next level down to get the intended
results (including on lower levels; they seem to inherit properly from the
second level, just not from
On 10/23/10 08:03 AM, Andy Graybeal wrote:
Greetings,
First off, I'm new to this and don't quite understand what I'm doing.
I would like different groups in my workplace to have their own folders. I
would like each file and folder underneath the parent folders to inherit the
ACL and group
25 matches
Mail list logo
