> I've moved to 7200RPM 2.5" laptop drives over 3.5"
> drives, for a
> combination of reasons: lower-power, better
> performance than a
> comparable sized 3.5" drives, and generally
> lower-capacities meaning
> resilver times are smaller. They're a bit more $/GB,
> but not a lot.
> If you can s
Regarding the writeback cache on disks, what is the recommended method to
disable the cache? Through HBA firmware, or via Solaris?
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 7:00 AM, wrote:
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 09:09:52 -0500
> From: John D Groenveld
> To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Subject:
Enabled, timeout is 10 us, depth is 4
>
>
Thank you!
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Edward Ned Harvey <
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com> wrote:
> > From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Coope
Which 320 series drive are you targeting, specifically? The ~$100 80GB variant
should perform as well as the more expensive versions if your workload is more
random from what I've seen/read.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss
Over provisioning does not directly increase flash performance, but allows
for greater reliability as the drive ages by improving garbage collection
efforts and reducing write amplification. This article doesn't provide any
sources, but it explains the concept at a very basic level -
http://thessd
