but are there any
other things I should take into consideration? It's not a major problem as
the system is intended for storage and users are not supposed to go in and
untar huge tarfiles on it as it's not a fast system ;-)
Andy
Andy Thomas,
Time Domain Systems
Tel: +44 (0
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011, andy thomas wrote:
However, one of our users recently put a 35 Gb tar.gz file on this server
and uncompressed it to a 215 Gb tar file. But when he tried to untar it,
after about 43 Gb had been extracted we noticed the disk usage
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011, Joerg Schilling wrote:
andy thomas a...@time-domain.co.uk wrote:
What 'tar' program were you using? Make sure to also try using the
Solaris-provided tar rather than something like GNU tar.
I was using GNU tar actually as the original archive was created on a
Linux
Does anyone know where I can still find the SUNWsmbs and SUNWsmbskr
packages for the Sparc version of OpenSolaris? I wanted to experiment with
ZFS/CIFS on my Sparc server but the ZFS share command fails with:
zfs set sharesmb=on tank1/windows
cannot share 'tank1/windows': smb
RAIDz1 pools on this
server but these are working fine.
Andy
-
Andy Thomas,
Time Domain Systems
Tel: +44 (0)7866 556626
Fax: +44 (0)20 8372 2582
http://www.time-domain.co.uk
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012, Richard Elling wrote:
Hi Andy
On Feb 14, 2012, at 10:37 AM, andy thomas wrote:
On one of our servers, we have a RAIDz1 ZFS pool called 'maths2' consisting of
7 x 300 Gb disks which in turn contains a single ZFS filesystem called 'home'.
Yesterday, using the 'ls
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
While I'm not in need of upgrading my server at an emergency level, I'm
starting to think about it -- to be prepared (and an upgrade could be
triggered by a failure at this point; my server dates to 2006).
One of my most vital servers is a Netra
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of andy thomas
One of my most vital servers is a Netra 150 dating from 1997 - still going
strong, crammed with 12 x 300 Gb disks and running Solaris 9
I have a ZFS filseystem and create weekly snapshots over a period of 5
weeks called week01, week02, week03, week04 and week05 respectively. Ny
question is: how do the snapshots relate to each other - does week03
contain the changes made since week02 or does it contain all the changes
made
According to a Sun document called something like 'ZFS best practice' I
read some time ago, best practice was to use the entire disk for ZFS and
not to partition or slice it in any way. Does this advice hold good for
FreeBSD as well?
I looked at a server earlier this week that was running
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:47 PM, andy thomas a...@time-domain.co.uk wrote:
According to a Sun document called something like 'ZFS best practice' I read
some time ago, best practice was to use the entire disk for ZFS and not to
partition or slice
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Richard Elling wrote:
On Oct 11, 2012, at 2:58 PM, Phillip Wagstrom phillip.wagst...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 11, 2012, at 4:47 PM, andy thomas wrote:
According to a Sun document called something like 'ZFS best practice' I read
some time ago, best practice was to use
12 matches
Mail list logo
