Those are interesting results.
yes, indeed
Does this mean you've already written lzo support into ZFS?
no, i`m not a real coder, but there exists an lzo patch for zfs-fuse which
has also been discussed here, afaik.
not sure if this has already been included in zfs-fuse tree - just wanted to
check out, but website (http://www.wizy.org/wiki/ZFS_on_FUSE) seems down for
the moment - if this takes longer to recover (happens often and normally
doesn`t) maybe i have it left on my system somewhere where i tried zfs-fuse
with lzo patch and where i did thos performance comparison.
also see:
http://groups.google.com/group/zfs-fuse/tree/browse_frm/month/2007-04/541ff514ecc880b2?rnum=31_done=%2Fgroup%2Fzfs-fuse%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fmonth%2F2007-04%3F#doc_a489f630aa4aa189
http://groups.google.com/group/zfs-fuse/tree/browse_frm/month/2007-04/b85b3bd20725fec6?rnum=11_done=%2Fgroup%2Fzfs-fuse%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fmonth%2F2007-04%3F#doc_b85b3bd20725fec6
If not, that would be a great next step
if other performance comparisons give similar results, i really think so.
not sure, if my results are reliable, but at least it`s worth taking a closer
look, because also eric dillman told, it would perform better than lzjb - at
least with zfs-fuse.
licensing issues can be sorted out later..
good attitude ! :)
zfs-fuse author/maintainer is Ricardo Correia and the lzo patch was done by
Eric Dillmann. I can provide contact data if you like.
roland
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
