Re: [zfs-discuss] Mirror Gone

2011-09-27 Thread Daniel Carosone
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 08:29:03PM -0400, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: > There is only one way for this to make sense: You did not have mirror-1 in > the first place. You accidentally added 4 & 5 without mirroring. Not true. 4 & 5 may have been added initially as a mirror, then 5 detached from the

Re: [zfs-discuss] Mirror Gone

2011-09-27 Thread Mark Musante
On 27 Sep 2011, at 18:29, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: >> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- >> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Tony MacDoodle >> >> >> Now: >> mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 >> c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 >> c1t

Re: [zfs-discuss] Mirror Gone

2011-09-27 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Tony MacDoodle > > Original: > mirror-0  ONLINE   0 0 0 >     c1t2d0  ONLINE   0 0 0 >     c1t3d0  ONLINE   0 0 0 >   mirror-1  ONLIN