Re: [zfs-discuss] Multiple SLOG devices per pool
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 08:49:00PM -0700, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Ray Van Dolson I have a pool with a single SLOG device rated at Y iops. If I add a second (non-mirrored) SLOG device also rated at Y iops will my zpool now theoretically be able to handle 2Y iops? Or close to that? Yes. But we're specifically talking about sync mode writes. Not async, and not read. And we're not comparing apples to oranges etc, not measuring an actual number of IOPS, because of aggregation etc. But I don't think that's what you were asking. I don't think you are trying to quantify the number of IOPS. I think you're trying to confirm the qualitative characteristic, If I have N slogs, I will write N times faster than a single slog. And that's a simple answer. Yes. Thanks. :) ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Re: [zfs-discuss] Multiple SLOG devices per pool
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Ray Van Dolson I have a pool with a single SLOG device rated at Y iops. If I add a second (non-mirrored) SLOG device also rated at Y iops will my zpool now theoretically be able to handle 2Y iops? Or close to that? Yes. But we're specifically talking about sync mode writes. Not async, and not read. And we're not comparing apples to oranges etc, not measuring an actual number of IOPS, because of aggregation etc. But I don't think that's what you were asking. I don't think you are trying to quantify the number of IOPS. I think you're trying to confirm the qualitative characteristic, If I have N slogs, I will write N times faster than a single slog. And that's a simple answer. Yes. ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
