> I don't think the 311 has any over-provisioning (other than the 7% from GB ->
> GiB conversion). I believe it is an X25-E with only 5 channels populated. The
> upcoming enterprise models are MLC based and have greater over-provisioning
> AFAIK.
> The 20GB 311 only costs ~ $100 though. The 100G
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 01:34:09PM -0700, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Brandon High wrote:
> >
> > The 20GB 311 only costs ~ $100 though. The 100GB Intel 710 costs ~ $650.
> >
> > The 311 is a good choice for home or budget users, and it seems that
> > the 710 is much bigger than i
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Brandon High wrote:
The 20GB 311 only costs ~ $100 though. The 100GB Intel 710 costs ~ $650.
The 311 is a good choice for home or budget users, and it seems that
the 710 is much bigger than it needs to be for slog devices.
Much too big is a good thing if it results in muc
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 01:21:26PM -0700, Brandon High wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> > It seems to perform similarly to the X-25E as well (3300 IOPS for
> > random writes). Perhaps the drive can be overprovisioned as well?
> >
> > My impression was that Intel
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> It seems to perform similarly to the X-25E as well (3300 IOPS for
> random writes). Perhaps the drive can be overprovisioned as well?
>
> My impression was that Intel was classifying the 3xx series as
> non-Enterprise however. Even with t
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:46:42PM -0700, Brandon High wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Markus Kovero
> wrote:
> > Hi, I was wondering do you guys have any recommendations as replacement for
> > Intel X25-E as it is being EOL’d? Mainly as for log device.
>
> The Intel 311 seems like a
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Markus Kovero wrote:
> Hi, I was wondering do you guys have any recommendations as replacement for
> Intel X25-E as it is being EOL’d? Mainly as for log device.
The Intel 311 seems like a good fit. It's a 20gb SLC device intended
to act as a cache device with the
On Wed, Sep 21 at 10:32, Markus Kovero wrote:
I'd say price range around same than X25-E was, main priorities
being predictable latency and performance. Also write wear shouldn't
get an issue when writing 150MB/s 24/7 365.
At 150MB/s continuously, you're writing 5PB/year (assuming a write
ampli
> Can you rank your priorities:
> + cost/IOPS
> + cost
> + latency
> + predictable latency
> + HA-cluster capable
>
> There are quite a number of devices available now, at widely varying costs,
> application, and performance.
> -- richard
I'd say price range around s
On Sep 20, 2011, at 12:21 AM, Markus Kovero wrote:
> Hi, I was wondering do you guys have any recommendations as replacement for
> Intel X25-E as it is being EOL’d? Mainly as for log device.
Can you rank your priorities:
+ cost/IOPS
+ cost
+ latency
+ predictable l
10 matches
Mail list logo
