Re: [zfs-discuss] iscsi confusion

2012-09-28 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
(opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
 I am confused, because I would have expected a 1-to-1 mapping, if you create
 an iscsi target on some system, you would have to specify which LUN it
 connects to.  But that is not the case...

Nope. one target can have anything from zero (which is kinda useless)
or many LUNs.

 I shouldn't be thinking in such linear terms.  When I create an iscsi
 target, don't think of it as connecting to a device - instead, think of it
 as sort of a channel.  Any initiator connecting to it can see any of the
 devices that I have done add-views on.

Yup

  But each iscsi target can only be
 used by one initiator at a time.

Nope. Many people use iscsi to provide shared storage (e.g. for
clustering), where two or more initiators connetcs to the same target.

-- 
Fajar
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] iSCSI confusion

2010-05-24 Thread Scott Meilicke
VMware will properly handle sharing a single iSCSI volume across multiple ESX 
hosts. We have six ESX hosts sharing the same iSCSI volumes - no problems.

-Scott
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] iSCSI confusion

2010-05-23 Thread Tim Cook
Yes, it requires a clustered filesystem to share out a single LUN to
multiple hosts. Vmfs3, however bad of an implementation, is in fact a
clustered filesystem.   I highly doubt nfs is your problem though. I'd take
nfs over iscsi and vmfs any day.

On May 23, 2010 8:06 PM, Chris Dunbar - Earthside, LLC 
cdun...@earthside.net wrote:

Hello,

I think I know the answer to this, but not being an iSCSI expert I am hoping
to be pleasantly surprised by your answers. I currently use ZFS plus NFS to
host a shared VMFS store for my VMware ESX cluster. It's easy to set up and
high availability works great since all the ESX hosts see the same storage
pool. However, NFS performance has been pretty poor and I am looking for
other options. I do not currently use any SSD drives in my pool and I
understand adding a couple as ZIL devices might improve performance. I am
also thinking about switching to iSCSI. Here is my confusion/question. Is it
possible to share the same ZFS file system with multiple ESX hosts via
iSCSI? My belief is that an iSCSI connection is sort of like having a
dedicated physical drive and therefore does not lend itself to sharing
between multiple systems. Please set me straight.

Thank you,
Chris Dunbar

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] iSCSI confusion

2010-05-23 Thread Richard Elling
On May 23, 2010, at 6:05 PM, Chris Dunbar - Earthside, LLC wrote:

 Hello,
 
 I think I know the answer to this, but not being an iSCSI expert I am hoping 
 to be pleasantly surprised by your answers. I currently use ZFS plus NFS to 
 host a shared VMFS store for my VMware ESX cluster. It's easy to set up and 
 high availability works great since all the ESX hosts see the same storage 
 pool. However, NFS performance has been pretty poor and I am looking for 
 other options. I do not currently use any SSD drives in my pool and I 
 understand adding a couple as ZIL devices might improve performance. I am 
 also thinking about switching to iSCSI. Here is my confusion/question. Is it 
 possible to share the same ZFS file system with multiple ESX hosts via iSCSI?

Yes.

 My belief is that an iSCSI connection is sort of like having a dedicated 
 physical drive and therefore does not lend itself to sharing between multiple 
 systems.

No.

That said, if a single iSCSI target is concurrently shared by two initiators,
then the access needs to be controlled in some way, via a shared storage
mechanism or reservations.
 -- richard

-- 
Richard Elling
rich...@nexenta.com   +1-760-896-4422
ZFS and NexentaStor training, Rotterdam, July 13-15, 2010
http://nexenta-rotterdam.eventbrite.com/

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss