Actually, I hacked into the Pentagon foreign policy computer and found that the
US originally planed to invade Kyrgyzstan, but Donald Rumsfeld couldn't spell it,
and George Bush kept calling it "kergystan" so they gave up and picked Iraq.
Easier to pronounce and somewhat easier to spell. Dan Quayl
After careful consideration, Gary Smith wrote:
>We currently have the strength to battle Saddam and keep him from
>becoming a nuclear power, or peddling that power to the nearest
>terrorist.
Unless I miss my guess, he has already peddled plenty to the nearest
terrorists. I'll bet there are suit
No, it isn't hypocrisy. It is realizing that our one nation only has so
much power and ability to stop wrong things from occurring. Imagine how
many would die had we attacked the Soviets or Chinese, in order to stop
their slaughtering of their own peoples? Back then, we did not have a
human rights
After careful consideration, Jon Spencer wrote:
>I find it interesting that those who oppose taking out Saddam also feel
>offended when the truth is spoken about him, but feel no restraint when
>impugning with unbridled passion those with whom they disagree (e.g.,.
>President Bush).
I am not offe
