Re: [ZION] War in Iraq

2002-10-21 Thread Marc A. Schindler


"John W. Redelfs" wrote:

> At 12:03 PM, Monday, 10/21/02, Marc A. Schindler wrote:
> >Incidentally, just to twit those who belittle Jimmy Carter's long
> >crusade against war, it was Carter who went to Pyongyang about 6 or 7
> >years ago and defused the last dangerous situationt here. Maybe Bush
> >should use Carter this time, too ;-)
>
> Jimmy Carter is in the CFR.
>

Well, then, like I said -- he'd be a natural!

--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

“We do not think that there is an incompatibility between words and deeds; the
worst thing is to rush into action before the consequences have been properly
debated…To think of the future and wait was merely another way of saying one was
a coward; any idea of moderation was just an attempt to disguise one’s unmanly
character; ability to understand a question from all sides meant that one was
totally unfitted for action.” – Pericles about his fellow-Athenians, as quoted by
Thucydides in “The Peloponessian Wars”

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===




Re: [ZION] War in Iraq

2002-10-21 Thread Marc A. Schindler
I hestitate to mention this, because I know Stephen will get upset if I tweak the
Canadians on this list, but Canada is guilty in this whole chain of things, too.
The technology of using research reactors to make weapons grade plutonium was
sold to Pakistan by Atomic Energy Canada Ltd. We relied on the Nuclear
Proliferation Treaty to prevent Pakistan from making military use of the
technology. There's no way one can prove the link, of course, but I doubt any
"Chinese walls," if you'll pardon the pun, exist in Pakistan between civilian
research and the military in such a strategic area. We were more interested in
the money than in contributing to what might some day be a very volatile
situation. We've also sold similar technology to South Korea and Romania. Several
others, too, but I can't remember off the top of my head who.

"John W. Redelfs" wrote:

> At 12:03 PM, Monday, 10/21/02, Marc A. Schindler wrote:
> >I keep asking why Pakistan isn't being targetted instead of Iraq. We can
> >add another piece of turtle meat to the fire: there is at least the
> >accusation that Pakistan supplied North Korea with its light gas
> >centrifugal technology (which it got from the US) which is used to
> >produce enriched uranium. Pakistan has denied it. The US is also
> >accusing China of helping North Korea, but I can't see how a nuclear war
> >in the region would be to Beijing's advantage.
>
> It is worse than that.  Pakistan got The Bomb from China who got The Bomb
> from us.  We talk about nuclear proliferation, but we don't actually do
> anything about it.  Another UBI, China supplied ICBMs to Pakistan, not just
> nuclear technology.  And that was in direct violation of anti-proliferation
> treaties.  Shortly afterwards we extended to them a binding Permanent
> Normal Trade relations agreement.
>
> I just don't understand this telestial world.  I'm completely
> confused.  Why is it, that almost every 10 to 20 years we get into a war
> with someone who has been built up and armed by us?
>
> John W. Redelfs   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ===
> "I can image a world without war, a world without fear, a
> world  without hate.  And I can picture us attacking that
> world, because they'd never expect it.' --Jack Handy
> ===
> All my opinions are tentative pending further data. --JWR
>
> /
> ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
> ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
> /
>

--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

“We do not think that there is an incompatibility between words and deeds; the
worst thing is to rush into action before the consequences have been properly
debated…To think of the future and wait was merely another way of saying one was
a coward; any idea of moderation was just an attempt to disguise one’s unmanly
character; ability to understand a question from all sides meant that one was
totally unfitted for action.” – Pericles about his fellow-Athenians, as quoted by
Thucydides in “The Peloponessian Wars”

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===





Re: [ZION] War in Iraq

2002-10-21 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 05:39 PM 10/21/2002, JWR wrote:

At 12:03 PM, Monday, 10/21/02, Marc A. Schindler wrote:

I keep asking why Pakistan isn't being targetted instead of Iraq. We can
add another piece of turtle meat to the fire: there is at least the
accusation that Pakistan supplied North Korea with its light gas
centrifugal technology (which it got from the US) which is used to
produce enriched uranium. Pakistan has denied it. The US is also
accusing China of helping North Korea, but I can't see how a nuclear war
in the region would be to Beijing's advantage.


It is worse than that.  Pakistan got The Bomb from China who got The Bomb 
from us.

And according to Major Racey Jordan (_Major Jordan's Diaries_), who flew 
lend-lease supply missions from Alaska to the Soviet Union, the Soviet's 
were given all the materials, plans and specifications to build their own 
Atomic Bomb--a direct result of Harry Hopkin's involvement in the process.



--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Nations are defined by their founders. George Washington set a standard of
selfless public service and heroic private virtue against which American
politicians continue to be measured - and found wanting - even today." 
--Steven W. Mosher 

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] War in Iraq

2002-10-21 Thread John W. Redelfs
At 12:03 PM, Monday, 10/21/02, Marc A. Schindler wrote:

I keep asking why Pakistan isn't being targetted instead of Iraq. We can
add another piece of turtle meat to the fire: there is at least the
accusation that Pakistan supplied North Korea with its light gas
centrifugal technology (which it got from the US) which is used to
produce enriched uranium. Pakistan has denied it. The US is also
accusing China of helping North Korea, but I can't see how a nuclear war
in the region would be to Beijing's advantage.


It is worse than that.  Pakistan got The Bomb from China who got The Bomb 
from us.  We talk about nuclear proliferation, but we don't actually do 
anything about it.  Another UBI, China supplied ICBMs to Pakistan, not just 
nuclear technology.  And that was in direct violation of anti-proliferation 
treaties.  Shortly afterwards we extended to them a binding Permanent 
Normal Trade relations agreement.

I just don't understand this telestial world.  I'm completely 
confused.  Why is it, that almost every 10 to 20 years we get into a war 
with someone who has been built up and armed by us?

John W. Redelfs   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
"I can image a world without war, a world without fear, a
world  without hate.  And I can picture us attacking that
world, because they'd never expect it.' --Jack Handy
===
All my opinions are tentative pending further data. --JWR

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] War in Iraq

2002-10-21 Thread John W. Redelfs
At 12:03 PM, Monday, 10/21/02, Marc A. Schindler wrote:

Incidentally, just to twit those who belittle Jimmy Carter's long
crusade against war, it was Carter who went to Pyongyang about 6 or 7
years ago and defused the last dangerous situationt here. Maybe Bush
should use Carter this time, too ;-)


Jimmy Carter is in the CFR.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] War in Iraq

2002-10-12 Thread Jon Spencer

I do, and this one's OK.  I'll let you know if things change.

Jon

Marc A. Schindler wrote:

Is the US's goal as benevolent as George Bush would like to make it
seem?
Who guards the guardians in a world police state?

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: Pakistan election (was Re: [ZION] War in Iraq)

2002-10-11 Thread Marc A. Schindler



"Marc A. Schindler" wrote:

> I was wrong for the right reason.

 That should of course have read "right for the wrong reason." My point was that 
the islamicists are gaining control of Pakistan's parliamentary system, that this will 
increase pressure on the military government, which will not relinquish power 
willingly, and when the cork does pop, the US will have another group of 65-odd 
million upset at it for propping up the military regime
in the first place. And they'll have the bomb, already tested.

> They look placed to control either main party's coalition. The regional government 
>they won is in the Northwest Frontier, too -- as in Khyber Pass and Peshawar. Voter 
>turnout has been very poor, as most Pakistanis realize the election is a sham 
>(contrary to what Bush's press spokesman seems to think). This will just increase the 
>pressure on the
> pressure cooker there.
>
> Mark Gregson wrote:
>
> >
> > -- Marc --
> > I said they'd win a majority of the seats set aside for general election, and that 
>they have done, both in regional and in the national parliament.
> >
> > -- Me --
> > How have they won a majority of the seats set aside for general election?  There 
>are 272 general seats.  60 are reserved for women and another 10 are reserved for 
>minority religious groups.  That leaves 202 general sets.  The fundamentalists have 
>apparently won 14 so far, of 40 reporting.  That is not a majority of all the seats 
>and is not a majority of the seats reporting so far.
> >
> > =  Mark Gregson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  =
> >
> >
> > --
> > __
> >
> > Download the FREE Opera browser at www.opera.com/download/
> >
> > Free OperaMail at http://www.operamail.com/
> >
> > Powered by Outblaze
> >
> > /
> > ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
> > ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
> > /
> >
>
> --
> Marc A. Schindler
> Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland
>
> "The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling 
>short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark."
> --Michelangelo Buonarroti
>
> Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author 
>solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer, nor 
>those of any organization with which the author may be associated.
>
> /
> ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
> ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
> /
>

--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

"The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling 
short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark."
--Michelangelo Buonarroti

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author solely; 
its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer, nor those of 
any organization with which the author may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===





Re: Pakistan election (was Re: [ZION] War in Iraq)

2002-10-11 Thread Marc A. Schindler

I was wrong for the right reason. They look placed to control either main party's 
coalition. The regional government they won is in the Northwest Frontier, too -- as in 
Khyber Pass and Peshawar. Voter turnout has been very poor, as most Pakistanis realize 
the election is a sham (contrary to what Bush's press spokesman seems to think). This 
will just increase the pressure on the
pressure cooker there.

Mark Gregson wrote:

>
> -- Marc --
> I said they'd win a majority of the seats set aside for general election, and that 
>they have done, both in regional and in the national parliament.
>
> -- Me --
> How have they won a majority of the seats set aside for general election?  There are 
>272 general seats.  60 are reserved for women and another 10 are reserved for 
>minority religious groups.  That leaves 202 general sets.  The fundamentalists have 
>apparently won 14 so far, of 40 reporting.  That is not a majority of all the seats 
>and is not a majority of the seats reporting so far.
>
> =  Mark Gregson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  =
>
>
> --
> __
>
> Download the FREE Opera browser at www.opera.com/download/
>
> Free OperaMail at http://www.operamail.com/
>
> Powered by Outblaze
>
> /
> ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
> ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
> /
>

--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

"The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling 
short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark."
--Michelangelo Buonarroti

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author solely; 
its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer, nor those of 
any organization with which the author may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===





Re: Pakistan election (was Re: [ZION] War in Iraq)

2002-10-11 Thread Mark Gregson


-- Marc --
I said they'd win a majority of the seats set aside for general election, and that 
they have done, both in regional and in the national parliament.

-- Me --
How have they won a majority of the seats set aside for general election?  There are 
272 general seats.  60 are reserved for women and another 10 are reserved for minority 
religious groups.  That leaves 202 general sets.  The fundamentalists have apparently 
won 14 so far, of 40 reporting.  That is not a majority of all the seats and is not a 
majority of the seats reporting so far.

=  Mark Gregson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  =

   
-- 
__
Download the FREE Opera browser at www.opera.com/download/

Free OperaMail at http://www.operamail.com/

Powered by Outblaze

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: Pakistan election (was Re: [ZION] War in Iraq)

2002-10-11 Thread Marc A. Schindler



Mark Gregson wrote:

>
> > The first of my "prognostications" has come true: Islamic
> > fundamentalists have won the Pakistani election:
>
> No, fundamentalists have not won the election.  Read the whole article and then read 
>some other news reports.  Fundamentalists have not won the election and will not 
>control the government.
>

I said they'd win a majority of the seats set aside for general election, and that 
they have done, both in regional and in the national parliament. But I also said it 
wouldn't make any difference
because Mussharaf is still the military dictator and has the power to dismiss the PM 
and parliament. This just increases the pressure on the situation, which was my point.

In any case, let's go through the article point by point:

1. "A coalition of pro-Taliban parties  won control of a provincial legislature near 
the Afghan border Friday, the first solid results from Pakistan's election. Vote 
counting for the national
parliament was moving slowly."  This is one of four regional parliaments which 
includes the Northwest Frontier, a Taliban stronghold.

2. "For the first time since a 1999 coup, Pakistanis voted Thursday in elections the 
military government hailed as a historic return to democratic rule and the opposition 
denounced as a
stage-managed sleight of hand to mask resident Gen. Pervez Musharraf's firm grip on 
power.." Both Pakistan and the US are portraying this as a transition to democracy. 
Some (and I'm one of them)
believe it will not lead in the short run to Musharraf's fall (although eventually it 
will, but some other things have to happen first).

3. "Musharraf - an important U.S. ally in the war on terrorism - has created a 
military-controlled National Security Council that will vet all national policy 
decisions. He has also granted himself
the  power to sack the prime minister and dissolve parliament, rendering the vote 
little more than window-dressing for continued military rule." As above.

4. I predicted that Islamic fundamentalists would gain control over the national 
parliament in Islamabad. I had in mind a majority of those seats available for it to 
run for. That hasn't quite
happened, but they are going to play a pivotal role, controlling whatever ruling 
coalition wins, so I think I'm right for the wrong reason (and in any case this 
represents an increase in
fundamentalist support): "The religious parties also were surprisingly strong in the 
National Assembly, Pakistan's lawmaking lower house of Parliament.  With returns 
trickling in, the religious
alliance looked like it could emerge as a key partner in any coalition government in 
the center."

5. The situation as of last night in Islamabad: "But vote counting for the National 
Assembly was slow and by early Friday only 40 of the 272 general seats in the federal 
Parliament were confirmed.
Of those, the religious alliance already  had 14 seats, including one in the federal 
capital of Islamabad."

I haven't even looked at the Globe this morning.


>
> My prediction: when vote counting is complete the fundamentalists will not have the 
>swing votes. (Not that it would matter if they did, since Musharraf has veto power 
>and dismissal power, too ).
>
> > When the military dictatorship there falls, we will be facing an Islamic
> > fundamentalist nuclear power.
>
> Why are you so sure that the dictatorship will fall?  It's in a semi-transitional 
>phase right now, so by definition it cannot actually fall.
>

I don't see it transitioning in the least.

>
> =  Mark Gregson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  =
>
>
> --
> __
>
> Download the FREE Opera browser at www.opera.com/download/
>
> Free OperaMail at http://www.operamail.com/
>
> Powered by Outblaze
>
> /
> ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
> ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
> /
>

--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

"The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling 
short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark."
--Michelangelo Buonarroti

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author solely; 
its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer, nor those of 
any organization with which
the author may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an 

Pakistan election (was Re: [ZION] War in Iraq)

2002-10-11 Thread Mark Gregson


> The first of my "prognostications" has come true: Islamic
> fundamentalists have won the Pakistani election:

No, fundamentalists have not won the election.  Read the whole article and then read 
some other news reports.  Fundamentalists have not won the election and will not 
control the government.  

My prediction: when vote counting is complete the fundamentalists will not have the 
swing votes. (Not that it would matter if they did, since Musharraf has veto power and 
dismissal power, too ).

> When the military dictatorship there falls, we will be facing an Islamic
> fundamentalist nuclear power.

Why are you so sure that the dictatorship will fall?  It's in a semi-transitional 
phase right now, so by definition it cannot actually fall.  

=  Mark Gregson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  =

   
-- 
__
Download the FREE Opera browser at www.opera.com/download/

Free OperaMail at http://www.operamail.com/

Powered by Outblaze

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] War in Iraq

2002-10-08 Thread graymada

Yea, I tried that method already--didn't work. See my previous reply to Larry.

--
Steven Montgomery

> They're on Yahoo groups, so go to
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scripture-l> / and
> follow the instructions from there.
> 
> Steven Montgomery wrote:
> 
> > Can you tell me how to subscribe to Scripture-L?
> >
> > --
> > Steven Montgomery
> >
> > At 10:15 PM 10/7/2002, Marc wrote:
> > >Forwarded with permission from Scripture-L:
> >
> >
/> 
> > ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
> > ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
> >
/> 
> >
> 
> --
> Marc A. Schindler
> Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland
> 
> "The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high
and> 
> falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark."
> --Michelangelo Buonarroti
> 
> Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the
auth> or
> solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s
emp> loyer,
> nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.
> 
> ///> /
/
> ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
> ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
> ///> /
/
> 
> 
> 
> 

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^






Re: [ZION] War in Iraq

2002-10-08 Thread Marc A. Schindler

They're on Yahoo groups, so go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scripture-l/ and
follow the instructions from there.

Steven Montgomery wrote:

> Can you tell me how to subscribe to Scripture-L?
>
> --
> Steven Montgomery
>
> At 10:15 PM 10/7/2002, Marc wrote:
> >Forwarded with permission from Scripture-L:
>
> /
> ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
> ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
> /
>

--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

"The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and
falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark."
--Michelangelo Buonarroti

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===





Re: [ZION] War in Iraq

2002-10-08 Thread Steven Montgomery

Can you tell me how to subscribe to Scripture-L?

--
Steven Montgomery

At 10:15 PM 10/7/2002, Marc wrote:
>Forwarded with permission from Scripture-L:

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




RE: [ZION] War in Iraq

2002-10-03 Thread clifford

Its not the same if it comes from me Marc.  Ce la vie.

Clifford M Dubery

-Original Message-
From: Marc A. Schindler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 8:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ZION] War in Iraq


Feel free. I'm no longer on LDS-poll (I had to cut back my listserve
activity for
health reasons).

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Go on Marc, post it to LDS-poll :)
>
> Clifford Dubery
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc A. Schindler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 6:34 AM
> To: zion-l
> Subject: [ZION] War in Iraq
>
> Step 1.Co-op Congress. Status: half-done
> Step 2.Get the peacemakers out of the way:
> http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=1365350
> Step 3:Continue with the media fog that it's about WMD (sub-step:
> has the guy who wrote the phrase "regime change" for that speech been
> fired yet?)
>
> --
> Marc A. Schindler
> Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland
>
> "The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high
> and falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our
> mark."
> --Michelangelo Buonarroti
>
> Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the
> author solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the
> author’s employer, nor those of any organization with which the author
> may be associated.
>
>

> /
> ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
> ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
>

> /
>
>

/
> ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
> ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
>

/
>

--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

"The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and
falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark."
--Michelangelo Buonarroti

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the
author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s
employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.


/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///

/

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===






Re: [ZION] War in Iraq

2002-10-03 Thread Marc A. Schindler

Feel free. I'm no longer on LDS-poll (I had to cut back my listserve activity for
health reasons).

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Go on Marc, post it to LDS-poll :)
>
> Clifford Dubery
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc A. Schindler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 6:34 AM
> To: zion-l
> Subject: [ZION] War in Iraq
>
> Step 1.Co-op Congress. Status: half-done
> Step 2.Get the peacemakers out of the way:
> http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=1365350
> Step 3:Continue with the media fog that it's about WMD (sub-step:
> has the guy who wrote the phrase "regime change" for that speech been
> fired yet?)
>
> --
> Marc A. Schindler
> Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland
>
> "The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high
> and falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our
> mark."
> --Michelangelo Buonarroti
>
> Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the
> author solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the
> author’s employer, nor those of any organization with which the author
> may be associated.
>
> 
> /
> ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
> ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
> 
> /
>
> /
> ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
> ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
> /
>

--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

"The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and
falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark."
--Michelangelo Buonarroti

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===





RE: [ZION] War in Iraq

2002-10-03 Thread clifford

Go on Marc, post it to LDS-poll :)

Clifford Dubery

-Original Message-
From: Marc A. Schindler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 6:34 AM
To: zion-l
Subject: [ZION] War in Iraq


Step 1.Co-op Congress. Status: half-done
Step 2.Get the peacemakers out of the way:
http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=1365350
Step 3:Continue with the media fog that it's about WMD (sub-step:
has the guy who wrote the phrase "regime change" for that speech been
fired yet?)

--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

"The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high
and falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our
mark."
--Michelangelo Buonarroti

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the
author solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the
author’s employer, nor those of any organization with which the author
may be associated.


/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///

/

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===