On Sep 18, 2007, at 2:00 PM, Benji York wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Sep 18, 2007, at 6:46 AM, Manuzhai wrote:
...
What's new in ZODB4?
The ZODB project has been abandoned. Much of the work done in
that project was folded back into ZODB3.
Jim means ZODB *4*. :)
Thanks! It's nice to hav
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Sep 18, 2007, at 6:46 AM, Manuzhai wrote:
...
What's new in ZODB4?
The ZODB project has been abandoned. Much of the work done in that
project was folded back into ZODB3.
Jim means ZODB *4*. :)
--
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
___
On Sep 18, 2007, at 6:46 AM, Manuzhai wrote:
...
What's new in ZODB4?
The ZODB project has been abandoned. Much of the work done in that
project was folded back into ZODB3.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Python
Powered!
CTO
Manuzhai wrote at 2007-9-18 12:46 +0200:
> ...
>the Documentation link points to a page
>that seems to mostly have papers and presentation from 2000-2002.
There is a good guide to the ZODB from Andrew Kuchling (or similar).
It may be old -- but everything is still valid.
>On the internet, there
--On 18. September 2007 12:46:28 +0200 Manuzhai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello there,
For an application I'm working on (implemented mostly in Python), I
was looking for a good solution for our storage needs. First I was
thinking about some tuple- or triple-store, but upon further
reflectio
Hello there,
For an application I'm working on (implemented mostly in Python), I
was looking for a good solution for our storage needs. First I was
thinking about some tuple- or triple-store, but upon further
reflection I decided yesterday that an object database would probably
work much better. O
