On 2010-11-17 18:12, Shane Hathaway wrote:
No, RelStorage does not require two phase commit support from
the database. It turns out that a simple commit lock, which is
sufficient for preventing deadlocks and unreported conflicts
Are there any
On 11/19/2010 10:39 AM, Sachin Tekale wrote:
On 2010-11-17 18:12, Shane Hathaway wrote:
No, RelStorage does not require two phase commit support from the
database. It turns out that a simple commit lock, which is
sufficient for preventing deadlocks and unreported conflicts
Are there any
my suggestion: use mxodbc. involve shane so he can fold it into the main
relstorage line in the future. maybe even budget some money to pay him
so he has interest in the outcome of the mssql/odbc adapter for relstorage.
We have made very good experience with mxODBC to connect to SQL Server.
I have read that there is a problem to implement MS-SQL adapter
for Relstorage because the Two phase commit feature is not
exposed by MS-SQL server .
Is there solution to overcome this problem, Without
introducing too many layers?
Can we use PyMSSQL
Hi all,
I have read that there is a problem to implement MS-SQL adapter for
Relstorage because the “Two phase commit” feature is not exposed by
MS-SQL server .
Is there solution to overcome this problem, Without introducing too many
layers?
Can we use PyMSSQL and ADODB Python extension to
I have read that there is a problem to implement MS-SQL adapter for
Relstorage because the “Two phase commit” feature is not exposed by
MS-SQL server .
unsure about that. probably depends on the client access library.
Is there solution to overcome this problem, Without introducing too many
On 17 November 2010 16:34, Alan Runyan runy...@gmail.com wrote:
I have read that there is a problem to implement MS-SQL adapter for
Relstorage because the “Two phase commit” feature is not exposed by
MS-SQL server .
unsure about that. probably depends on the client access library.
At least
On 17 November 2010 17:05, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
On 17 November 2010 16:34, Alan Runyan runy...@gmail.com wrote:
I have read that there is a problem to implement MS-SQL adapter for
Relstorage because the “Two phase commit” feature is not exposed by
MS-SQL server .
unsure
On 11/17/2010 08:29 AM, Sachin Tekale wrote:
Hi all,
I have read that there is a problem to implement MS-SQL adapter for
Relstorage because the “Two phase commit” feature is not exposed by
MS-SQL server .
No, RelStorage does not require two phase commit support from the
database. It turns
On 11/17/2010 11:12 AM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
On 11/17/2010 08:29 AM, Sachin Tekale wrote:
Hi all,
I have read that there is a problem to implement MS-SQL adapter for
Relstorage because the “Two phase commit” feature is not exposed by
MS-SQL server .
No, RelStorage does not require two
10 matches
Mail list logo
