On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 02:07:06PM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Marius Gedminas
> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:41:11PM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Marius Ge
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 02:07:06PM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:41:11PM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> >> In 3.9 for FileStorage, if you give a starting t
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:41:11PM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
>> In 3.9 for FileStorage, if you give a starting tid that is toward the
>> end of the file,
>> it will scan backward,
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:41:11PM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> ...
> > Well, there is IStorage, and I think all storages (except for
> > FileStorage) implemented it faithfully
>
> I guess that depends on what you mean by faithfully. Mappin
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
...
> Well, there is IStorage, and I think all storages (except for
> FileStorage) implemented it faithfully
I guess that depends on what you mean by faithfully. MappingStorage
and Demostorage
in 3.8 inherited a null implementation from Bas
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:08:36AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 01:04:03PM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> >> ...
> >> > (Supporting both ZODB 3.8 and 3.9 is k
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 01:04:03PM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
>> ...
>> > (Supporting both ZODB 3.8 and 3.9 is kinda tricky, but with some very
>> > ugly hacks I managed.)
>>
>> This
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:08:25AM +, Chris Withers wrote:
> Marius Gedminas wrote:
> > * In ZODB 3.8, the 'version' argument of ClientStorage.history (as well
> > as other kinds of storages, I suppose) is mandatory. In ZODB 3.9
> > it's gone.
> >
> > Solved by peeking into the
Marius Gedminas wrote:
> * In ZODB 3.8, the 'version' argument of ClientStorage.history (as well
> as other kinds of storages, I suppose) is mandatory. In ZODB 3.9
> it's gone.
>
> Solved by peeking into the method signature with inspect.getargspec()
> and supplying a version on
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 01:04:03PM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> ...
> > (Supporting both ZODB 3.8 and 3.9 is kinda tricky, but with some very
> > ugly hacks I managed.)
>
> This sounds like something that needs to be fixed. Can you share som
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
...
> (Supporting both ZODB 3.8 and 3.9 is kinda tricky, but with some very
> ugly hacks I managed.)
This sounds like something that needs to be fixed. Can you share some of the
issues you ran into? (Or maybe file bugs reports.)
In particul
11 matches
Mail list logo
