On 02/02/2010 05:00 PM, Sylvain Viollon wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:44:19 +0100
> Christian Theune wrote:
>
>> On 02/02/2010 03:58 PM, Sylvain Viollon wrote:
>>> On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:30:41 +0100
>>> Christian Theune wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
Meh. That looks quirky in the history
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:44:19 +0100
Christian Theune wrote:
> On 02/02/2010 03:58 PM, Sylvain Viollon wrote:
> > On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:30:41 +0100
> > Christian Theune wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> >> Meh. That looks quirky in the history. If there are no changes,
> >> then the merge will
On 02/02/2010 03:58 PM, Sylvain Viollon wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:30:41 +0100
> Christian Theune wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
>> Meh. That looks quirky in the history. If there are no changes, then
>> the merge will be straight-forward.
>>
>
> I merged my branch into the trunk, it's ready f
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:30:41 +0100
Christian Theune wrote:
Hello,
> Meh. That looks quirky in the history. If there are no changes, then
> the merge will be straight-forward.
>
I merged my branch into the trunk, it's ready for a release.
Regards,
Sylvain,
--
Sylvain Viollon -- Inf
On 02/02/2010 11:17 AM, Sylvain Viollon wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 February 2010 09:08:42 Christian Theune wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>
> Hello,
>
>> I think I'm fine with your approach in general by now. I don't have the
>> time to review anything, though. The old version is happily there in SVN.
>>
>> I
On Tuesday 02 February 2010 09:08:42 Christian Theune wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
Hello,
> I think I'm fine with your approach in general by now. I don't have the
> time to review anything, though. The old version is happily there in SVN.
>
> IIRC you hadn't updated all unit tests last time, did you ca
Hi,
On 02/01/2010 05:47 PM, Sylvain Viollon wrote:
> Hello,
>
>I did few month ago a branch of zodbupdate, which works completely
> differently than the trunk. Instead of changing the pickle code of the
> record,
> it unpickle it, changing references at that point, and repickle if there is
