Jim Fulton wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
- I wonder if an argument could be made than we shouldn't
implicitly deactivate an object that has been accessed in a
a transaction while the transaction is still running.
Would this prevent ZODB from ever promising not to use more
Jim Fulton wrote:
My intuition is still that sharing objects between threads will
introduce a host of subtle bugs.
Yes, I'll +lots to this.
I'm much more interested in seeing a memory-limited cache of some
description an sad to see this thread derail into sharing data between
threads, which
+lots too...
I had completely forgot about _v_ attributes, and when I look at the code of
my oldest zope products, well... :)
De : Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date : Tue, 10 Oct 2006 12:09:36 +0100
À : Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc : Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED], Pascal Peregrina
On 09.10.2006, at 17:40, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
Hi there,
the DB.open method makes me wonder how it works
(http://svn.zope.org/ZODB/trunk/src/ZODB/DB.py?rev=69551view=auto)
It locks with self._a() and calls
