Re: [ZODB-Dev] Optimizing RelStorage Packing for large DBs
On 11/16/13 2:01 AM, Jens W. Klein wrote: Did I miss something? Any opinions much appreciated! Expect updates in this thread :) We did experience relstorage problems that we think could have been related to packing - we're not sure yet. So, I'm following this thread and your updates with great interest! regards, jw ___ For more information about ZODB, see http://zodb.org/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
Re: [ZODB-Dev] Optimizing RelStorage Packing for large DBs
On 11/18/13 12:19 PM, Jim Fulton wrote: On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Jens W. Klein j...@bluedynamics.com wrote: I started a new packing script for Relstorage (history free, postgresql). It is based on incoming reference counting. Did you look at zc.zodbdgc? I think it implements something very close to what you're proposing. It's been in production for a few years now at ZC. Not sure if it would need to be updated for relstorage. AFAICT it does not work against a relstorage backend. Or at least I think to understand that from: http://www.zodb.org/en/latest/documentation/articles/multi-zodb-gc.html [...This documentation does not apply to RelStorage which has the same features built-in, but accessible in different ways. Look at the options for the zodbpack script. The –prepack option creates a table containing the same information as we are creating in the reference database[...] regards, jw ___ For more information about ZODB, see http://zodb.org/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
[ZODB-Dev] Relstorage: postgres reports IDLE connection after first database write
Hi, Recently we realized Relstorage seems to start and never close a database connection after the first write. This database connection is reported to IDLE in postgres. Note: this IDLEing connection is only started after adding an object to a container - in our testing a Zope application root. Storing an attribute on the app root, seems to not result in leaving an IDLEing connection. Quick question: is this expected behaviour? Kind regards, jw ps. We suspected that his IDLEing connection keeps postgres from succefully running its auto vacuuming task, but we're actually not sure about that. ___ For more information about ZODB, see http://zodb.org/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
