On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/20/2012 01:47 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
>
> I
>
> had the impression that Tres was proposing more.
>
>
> I released BTrees 4.0.0, and created a ZODB branch for the (trivial)
> shift to depe
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> I released BTrees 4.0.0, and created a ZODB branch for the (trivial)
> shift to depending on it:
I had to tweak the C header inclusion a bit, so that the winbot could
create binary eggs. There's a 4.0.1 release on pypi now, which has
eggs buil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/2012 01:47 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
I
had the impression that Tres was proposing more.
I released BTrees 4.0.0, and created a ZODB branch for the (trivial)
shift to depending on it:
http://svn.zope.org/ZODB/branches/tseaver-btrees_as_egg/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/14/2012 06:23 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
>> On 14 October 2012 22:49, Jim Fulton wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Tres Seaver
>>> wrote: ...
> Well, I don't have time to chase
On 14 October 2012 23:33, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
>> On 14 October 2012 22:49, Jim Fulton wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
>>> ...
> Well, I don't have time to chase BTrees. This could always be done in
> Z
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
> On 14 October 2012 22:49, Jim Fulton wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
>> ...
Well, I don't have time to chase BTrees. This could always be done in
ZODB 5. :)
>>>
>>> I could help chop BTrees out, if t
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
> On 14 October 2012 22:49, Jim Fulton wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
>> ...
Well, I don't have time to chase BTrees. This could always be done in
ZODB 5. :)
>>>
>>> I could help chop BTrees out, if t
On 14 October 2012 22:49, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> ...
>>> Well, I don't have time to chase BTrees. This could always be done in
>>> ZODB 5. :)
>>
>> I could help chop BTrees out, if that would be useful: most of the
>> effort will be purely subt
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
...
>> Well, I don't have time to chase BTrees. This could always be done in
>> ZODB 5. :)
>
> I could help chop BTrees out, if that would be useful: most of the
> effort will be purely subtractive in the ZODB package (I don't think
> anything
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/14/2012 05:20 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Hanno Schlichting
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
>>> Goal: Give persistent, ZODB and ZEO their own release cycles.
>>
>> In which distribut
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
>> Goal: Give persistent, ZODB and ZEO their own release cycles.
>
> In which distribution would BTrees end up in?
Still ZODB.
> I think the pure-Python work for BTrees isn't yet fini
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
> Goal: Give persistent, ZODB and ZEO their own release cycles.
In which distribution would BTrees end up in?
I think the pure-Python work for BTrees isn't yet finished, but I
could be wrong. But if we are extracting packages into separate
dist
12 matches
Mail list logo
