[ZODB-Dev] Re: ZEO and time.sleep

2007-03-29 Thread Jürgen Kartnaller
Jim Fulton wrote: On Mar 28, 2007, at 6:37 PM, Benji York wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: On Mar 28, 2007, at 6:28 PM, Benji York wrote: threading.Connection threading.Condition :) Yeah, that. :) What was the time to return the first request after the fix? I didn't stick around for the

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: ZEO and time.sleep

2007-03-29 Thread Stephan Richter
On Thursday 29 March 2007 03:51, Jürgen Kartnaller wrote: I didn't stick around for the post-Linux-kernel-recompile testing, but when we hacked the Python standard library to use sleep(0) all the time (emulating an infinite granularity timer), it went down to about 10 seconds.  A pretty

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: ZEO and time.sleep

2007-03-29 Thread Jim Fulton
On Mar 29, 2007, at 3:51 AM, Jürgen Kartnaller wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: On Mar 28, 2007, at 6:37 PM, Benji York wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: On Mar 28, 2007, at 6:28 PM, Benji York wrote: threading.Connection threading.Condition :) Yeah, that. :) What was the time to return the first

[ZODB-Dev] Re: ZEO and time.sleep

2007-03-29 Thread Jürgen Kartnaller
Jim Fulton wrote: On Mar 29, 2007, at 3:51 AM, Jürgen Kartnaller wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: On Mar 28, 2007, at 6:37 PM, Benji York wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: On Mar 28, 2007, at 6:28 PM, Benji York wrote: threading.Connection threading.Condition :) Yeah, that. :) What was the time

[ZODB-Dev] Re: ZEO and time.sleep

2007-03-29 Thread Jürgen Kartnaller
Jim Fulton wrote: On Mar 29, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Jürgen Kartnaller wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: On Mar 29, 2007, at 3:51 AM, Jürgen Kartnaller wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: On Mar 28, 2007, at 6:37 PM, Benji York wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: On Mar 28, 2007, at 6:28 PM, Benji York wrote: