Re: [ZODB-Dev] zodbpickle claim (but OS X is not unix)

2013-07-09 Thread Christian Tismer
On 7/4/13 9:40 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/04/2013 11:52 AM, Stephan Richter wrote: On Thursday, July 04, 2013 05:47:39 AM Christian Tismer wrote: there is now a pull request, completely tested on OS X, ready to be applied with no other work

Re: [ZODB-Dev] zodbpickle claim (but OS X is not unix)

2013-07-05 Thread Christian Tismer
On 04.07.13 17:52, Stephan Richter wrote: On Thursday, July 04, 2013 05:47:39 AM Christian Tismer wrote: there is now a pull request, completely tested on OS X, ready to be applied with no other work involved. Yeah, I saw that. thanks. It would be nice if that version could be uploaded,

Re: [ZODB-Dev] zodbpickle claim (but OS X is not unix)

2013-07-03 Thread Christian Tismer
Hi Stefan, fine with me. I have the patch working. Will complete the 3.3 module, update the doap record to 0.5.1 and submit a pull request this evening. All the best - chris Sent from my Ei4Steve On Jul 3, 2013, at 2:09, Stephan Richter stephan.rich...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Christian, On

[ZODB-Dev] zodbpickle claim (but OS X is not unix)

2013-07-02 Thread Christian Tismer
Hi guys, I very much appreciate the creation of zodbpickle, as it really solves the problem of pickling compatibility. What I do not like is if a package makes a claim in its doap record, is uploaded on PyPI, and the claim is not the reality. I installed zodbpickle happily on Python 3.3 and

Re: [ZODB-Dev] zodbpickle claim (but OS X is not unix)

2013-07-02 Thread Christian Tismer
On 03.07.13 00:41, Christian Tismer wrote: sorry, I hit the send button while refining my text. Here it goes: So on OS X Mountain lion, I get with $ pip install zodbpickle: cc -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -dynamic -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/opt/sqlite/include -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv

Re: [ZODB-Dev] zodbpickle claim (but OS X is not unix)

2013-07-02 Thread Stephan Richter
Hi Christian, On Wednesday, July 03, 2013 01:01:14 AM Christian Tismer wrote: I would appreciate if that simple-to-fix bug could be removed, and I would be happy to help with this. I am not a C expert, so I cannot comment. And while we are at it: How about completion of the module, to let it