Re: [ZODB-Dev] Getting an up to date instance of a persistent object

2006-06-02 Thread David Binger
On Jun 2, 2006, at 5:05 AM, Pascal Peregrina wrote: Below is a partial illustration of what I was saying earlier: in a given connection, just after a conn.sync(), if I access the _p_serial attribute of a persistent object and the object state is outdated, then the up to date state won't

RE: [ZODB-Dev] Getting an up to date instance of a persistent object

2006-06-02 Thread Pascal Peregrina
Now it all makes sense :) I was right in my initial assumptions then (but probably unclear when exposing it). Thanks a lot. Pascal -Message d'origine- De : David Binger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : vendredi 2 juin 2006 15:51 À : Pascal Peregrina Cc : Dieter Maurer; Federico

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Getting an up to date instance of a persistent object

2006-05-25 Thread Dieter Maurer
Pascal Peregrina wrote at 2006-5-24 09:57 +0100: ... I have a question regarding what triggers the reloading of an object state from ZODB (in order to set the most up to date one). There is only one reason: that it is not in the cache or a ghost. At transaction boundaries (and only there!)