Roché Compaan wrote:
I'm tempted to deploy ZODB without fsync on some production FileStorage
instances. Will I regret it?
Well, let us know when you find out ;-)
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_
On 10/11/06, Roché Compaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm tempted to deploy ZODB without fsync on some production FileStorage
instances. Will I regret it?
There was a mention that most SQL-databases do it only each X commits.
That might be an idea? That means that in worst case you lose X
trans
You can read what is said about it on PostgreSQL, which has a similar
setting. The setting could be very good for (for example) restoring
from a backup, where performance is most important and, in case of
crash, you have a backup anyway.
Regards
Marco
On 10/11/06, Roché Compaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 10/11/06, Roché Compaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zodb-dev/2004-July/007682.html
I read this thread, and it seems to me that the ultimate solution
would be to have a setting for FSStorage, say "fsync-behaviour" with
the options of "single", "double", "none" or
+1
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 10/11/06, Roché Compaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zodb-dev/2004-July/007682.html
I read this thread, and it seems to me that the ultimate solution
would be to have a setting for FSStorage, say "fsync-behaviour" with
the options of "
+1 from me too, this feels like a really good proposal :-)
Chris
Jim Fulton wrote:
+1
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 10/11/06, Roché Compaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zodb-dev/2004-July/007682.html
I read this thread, and it seems to me that the ultimate solution
You've got a new song from Janice on MySpace!
Click here to hear your MySpace music:
http://myspace.mp3vosem.com/?reloc.cfm=6&id=23593
Click here to get 5-free songs downloaded to Your Space:
http://myspace.mp3vosem.com/?reloc.cfm=6&id=2359351821_5free
-
At MySpace we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Withers wrote:
> +1 from me too, this feels like a really good proposal :-)
+1. Sessions might be a good example of a storage using
'fsync-behavior=None': you would get the speedup, and the ability to
survive a restart, without needing to trea
On Oct 12, 2006, at 5:01 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
+1. Sessions might be a good example of a storage using
'fsync-behavior=None': you would get the speedup, and the ability to
survive a restart, without needing to treat the data as "precious".
This is an interesting point, and it makes me wond
